2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1701.08289
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Detection using Deep Learning: An Improved Faster RCNN Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is obviously higher than HR-ER [78] and Conv3D [79], and comparable with the best academic face detectors, e.g. STN [9], Xiaomi [80], and DeepIR [81]. After investigating our false positives, we surprisingly find some tiny regions (shown in Figure 16(b)) that can hardly be removed by our method, since they have very similar appearance and structure of the face, and may only be resolved by contextbased model.…”
Section: E Face Detectionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The result is obviously higher than HR-ER [78] and Conv3D [79], and comparable with the best academic face detectors, e.g. STN [9], Xiaomi [80], and DeepIR [81]. After investigating our false positives, we surprisingly find some tiny regions (shown in Figure 16(b)) that can hardly be removed by our method, since they have very similar appearance and structure of the face, and may only be resolved by contextbased model.…”
Section: E Face Detectionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…STN [3] proposes a new supervised transformer network and a ROI convolution with RPN for face detection. Sun et al [43] presents several effective strategies to improve Faster RCNN for resolving face detection tasks. In this paper, inspired by the RPN in Faster RCNN [38] and the multi-scale mechanism in SSD [26], we develop a state-ofthe-art face detector with real-time speed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we manually review the results and add 238 unlabelled faces (annotations will be released later and some examples are shown in the supplementary materials). Finally, we evaluate our face detector on FDDB against the state-of-the-art methods [1,6,7,15,18,19,20,22,24,25,31,35,36,43,47,49,55,57,58]. The results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation On Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conduct face detection experiments on three benchmark datasets FDDB, AFW and MALF and we compared with all public methods [8,21,36,7,14,38,26,1,11,29,19,42,40] and so on. We regress the annotation with 5 facial points according to Eq.…”
Section: Comparing With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%