2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3023782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Detection Based on Receptive Field Enhanced Multi-Task Cascaded Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: With the continuous development of deep learning, face detection methods have made the greatest progress. For real-time detection, cascade CNN based on the lightweight model is still the dominant structure that predicts face in a coarse-to-fine manner with strong generalization ability. Compared to other methods, it is not required for a fixed size of the input. However, MTCNN still has poor performance in detecting tiny targets. To improve model generalization ability, we propose a Receptive Field Enhanced Mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This generally compares favorably with other works in literature which were based on different dataset. Li et al [25] proposed a Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm for monitoring driver physiological signals, achieving an accuracy of 97.5%, precision of 98.3%, and recall value of 94%. Siddiqui et al [26] proposed a machine learning model for monitoring drowsiness based on respiratory rate detection, achieving an accuracy of 87%, precision of 86%, and recall of 88%.…”
Section: E Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This generally compares favorably with other works in literature which were based on different dataset. Li et al [25] proposed a Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm for monitoring driver physiological signals, achieving an accuracy of 97.5%, precision of 98.3%, and recall value of 94%. Siddiqui et al [26] proposed a machine learning model for monitoring drowsiness based on respiratory rate detection, achieving an accuracy of 87%, precision of 86%, and recall of 88%.…”
Section: E Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P-R curve consists of a precision curve and a recall curve. The P-R curve reflects global performance [ 33 ]. The following equations are used to calculate precision, recall, and mAP: where is a false positive example, is a false negative example, is the real example, is a true negative example, is the average precision of a category; and k is the number of categories.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework fuses the feature maps of different branches for detecting hard small faces. [17] introduces a receptive field block to extract the robust feature map. Combined with cascaded CNN, it achieves continuous improvements on multiple related dataset.…”
Section: A Face Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%