2015
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1077912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face and body emotion recognition depend on different orientation sub-bands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results reveal that the low-level tuning of body emotion recognition changes during childhood. First, we replicated Balas and Huynh’s (2015) observation that adults exhibit a vertical orientation bias for body emotion recognition, in contrast to the horizontal orientation bias that is typically observed for facial emotion recognition. Children exhibited qualitatively the same bias across our entire age range, but with important quantitative changes in the magnitude of that bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results reveal that the low-level tuning of body emotion recognition changes during childhood. First, we replicated Balas and Huynh’s (2015) observation that adults exhibit a vertical orientation bias for body emotion recognition, in contrast to the horizontal orientation bias that is typically observed for facial emotion recognition. Children exhibited qualitatively the same bias across our entire age range, but with important quantitative changes in the magnitude of that bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For adults, vertical orientations are more important than horizontal orientation (Balas & Huynh, 2015), which is the opposite pattern observed for facial emotion recognition. This differential dependence on horizontal vs. vertical orientation for emotion categorization as a function of stimulus category suggests that the development of these two aspects of emotion categorization may proceed on different timescales, or have different properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Masking horizontal orientation information with noise also impairs face recognition performance relative to the masking of other orientation sub‐bands (Pachai, Sekuler, & Bennett, ), and demonstrates the lower efficiency of face recognition in the absence of this information. Besides face identification/discrimination, horizontal orientation information also proves superior than other orientation sub‐bands for emotion recognition (Huynh & Balas, ), an effect that is specific to faces and does not generalize to body stimuli (Balas & Huynh, ). While the horizontal orientation advantage does not extend to all aspects of face perception (gaze perception, for example, does not appear to selectively depend on horizontal information; Goffaux and Okamoto‐Barth, ), this information bias is nonetheless quite robust and applies to a broad class of judgments, demonstrating that key representations for processing faces recruit horizontal information to a disproportionate degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently spatial orientations have garnered attention for the role horizontal information appears to play in various aspects of face processing, such as detection (Balas, Schmidt, & Saville, 2015), identification (Dakin & Watt, 2009; Goffaux & Dakin, 2010; Goffaux, Duecker, Hausfeld, Schiltz, & Goebel, 2016; Goffaux & Greenwood, 2016; Goffaux & Schiltz, 2015; Pachai, Sekuler, Bennett, Schyns, & Ramon, 2017), and emotional facial expression recognition (Balas & Huynh, 2015; Balas, Huynh, Saville, & Schmidt, 2015; Duncan et al, 2017; Huynh & Balas, 2014; Yu, Chai, & Chung, 2018). Horizontal information also supports behavioral signatures of face-processing specialization, such as the face inversion effect (Goffaux et al, 2010, 2016; Pachai, Sekuler, & Bennett, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%