The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Façade defects classification from imbalanced dataset using meta learning‐based convolutional neural network

Abstract: Façade inspection is a regular but necessary maintenance task to ensure the safety, functioning, and aesthetics of a building. Traditional visual identification of façade defects is dangerous, time-consuming, and insufficient. Based on an image dataset and deep learning algorithms, an automatic façade defects classification technique is developed in this research. A layer-based categorization rule is proposed to categorize façade defects. To handle the problem of imbalanced data size among defect classes, a me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This optimizer has a feature that reflects the direction of the previous weight update when the weights are updated. The weight update formula of SGD with momentum is expressed in the form of Equation (7), where β, m, and ε refer to the momentum, momentum vector, and learning rate, respectively. In this study, the minibatch size for weight updates was set to eight, and β = 0.9 and ε=0.0001 based on experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This optimizer has a feature that reflects the direction of the previous weight update when the weights are updated. The weight update formula of SGD with momentum is expressed in the form of Equation (7), where β, m, and ε refer to the momentum, momentum vector, and learning rate, respectively. In this study, the minibatch size for weight updates was set to eight, and β = 0.9 and ε=0.0001 based on experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crack detection has been the mainstay of research on visual surveillance of faults in infrastructures, over last many decades. Its applicability has been researched upon in variety of application scenarios: tunnel safety inspection [61], [38], dam safety inspection [9], rail corridor inspection [52], steel bridges [22], [14], concrete bridges [16], mine safety [11], pavement crack detection [18], [25], building safety inspection [8], to name a few. The techniques for detection belong to two phases.…”
Section: A Vision-based Crack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to create a clean and standardized defects dataset, some research categorized the collected images according to an official design manual (Hüthwohl, Lu, & Brilakis, 2019), specific inspection operation code such as the pipeline assessment and certification program (PACP) (Yin et al., 2020), or customized categorization rules based on materials (Guo, Wang, Li, & Liu, 2020). Then, considering the imbalanced dataset problem caused by the variant occurring rates of different types of defects, researchers have proposed various algorithms such as oversampling (Mundt, Majumder, Murali, Panetsos, & Ramesh, 2019), weighted loss function (Meijer, Scholten, Clemens, & Knobbe, 2019), hierarchical classification (D. Li, Cong, & Guo, 2019) and meta learning (Guo et al., 2020). Moreover, some studies have explored the solution to small dataset problem through data augmentation (Cheng & Wang, 2018) and transfer learning (Gao & Mosalam, 2018; Liang, 2019; Silva & Lucena, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After cropping into image patches, the image patches were resized to pixel sizes of 224 × 224. Next, under the instruction of the categorization rules proposed in a previous research (Guo et al., 2020), the image patches were categorized into seven classes including six defect classes (crack, blistering, biological‐growth, spalling, delamination, and peeling, as shown in Figure 5) and no‐defects class. The dataset in this paper was developed based on the dataset used in a previous study (Guo et al., 2020).…”
Section: Validation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%