2011
DOI: 10.1002/mame.201000408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of Uniaxially Aligned Poly(propylene) Nanofibers via Handspinning

Abstract: A straightforward method, which is termed novel handspinning, is reported for producing uniaxially aligned sPP nanofibers. As demonstrated by SEM analysis, the morphologies of handspun sPP nanofibers are strongly dependent upon the processing conditions such as spinning method and solvent system. Compared to the normal electrospun sPP nanofibers, the handspun sPP nanofibers show smoother morphologies. FT‐IR analysis demonstrates a significant difference in polymer chain conformation between the handspun and el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conformation of polypropylene was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 4), which has been well-known to be a useful method to determine molecular and chain conformation. In FT-IR spectrum, it is clearly observed that the helical conformations were produced mainly when nanofiber electrospun, while hansdpun nanofiber appeared the long stands in the trans-planar conformation [24]. These results strongly suggest that the handspinning process produces more stretched fiber than the electrospun fiber, resulting in stiffer and stronger nanofiber [24].…”
Section: Handspinningsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conformation of polypropylene was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 4), which has been well-known to be a useful method to determine molecular and chain conformation. In FT-IR spectrum, it is clearly observed that the helical conformations were produced mainly when nanofiber electrospun, while hansdpun nanofiber appeared the long stands in the trans-planar conformation [24]. These results strongly suggest that the handspinning process produces more stretched fiber than the electrospun fiber, resulting in stiffer and stronger nanofiber [24].…”
Section: Handspinningsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Handspinning provides a number of options for polymers and solvents because their electrical properties are not relevant at all. Watanabe et al reported that the diameter and surface morphologies of handspun fiber depend on solvent systems and processing conditions to control simple mechanical force [24]. They exploit a typical polyolefins, polypropylene, to investigate the utilization of handspinning.…”
Section: Handspinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important aspects that affect the strength of nanofibers are the alignment of polymer chains along the axis of the fibers and the degree of crystallinity. In our previous report11, it was found that the HS process produced more stretched fibers than the ES process. However, the degree of crystallinity was not affected critically by the spinning method, i.e., electrospinning or handspinning, due to their relatively low crystallinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…More importantly, HS offers a number of options for polymers and solvents because, unlike in the ES process, their electrical properties are not relevant at all. In our previous report11, we found that the diameter and surface morphologies of handspun fiber depend on solvent systems and processing conditions to control simple mechanical force. Also, a significant difference in polymer chain conformation between the handspun and electrospun nanofibers was observed, and it was attributed to mechanical stretching force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation