2011
DOI: 10.1116/1.3646469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of ultra-high-density nanodot array patterns (∼3 Tbits/in.2) using electron-beam lithography

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inActive-matrix nanocrystalline Si electron emitter array with a function of electronic aberration correction for massively parallel electron beam direct-write lithography: Electron emission and pattern transfer characteristics J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 31, 06F703 (2013); 10.1116/1.4827819 Long nanoscale gaps on III-V substrates by electron beam lithography J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 30, 06F305 (2012); 10.1116/1.4766881 Tilted nanostructure fabrication by electron beam lithography J. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we included a layer of ITO to ensure the compatibility of EBL with our chosen substratequartz-based cover glasses used for cell culture. Standard EBL protocols are usually performed on a special substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer) that has good electron-conducting properties necessary to prevent charging distortion. ,, However, a quartz-based substrate has poor conductive properties, which leads to the deflection of incoming electrons by surface charges and is a significant source of pattern-placement error. Therefore, to eliminate this drifting effect, a thin layer (20 nm) of ITO was sputter-coated onto the cover glass substrate to ensure electron-conductive properties. , This deposition successfully eliminated beam drifting on a sample surface coated with ITO and allowed the production of precise patterns of grid-lines of approximately 100 nm in width (Figure B), a resolution comparable to the EBL limits obtained with standard silicon-wafer surfaces .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we included a layer of ITO to ensure the compatibility of EBL with our chosen substratequartz-based cover glasses used for cell culture. Standard EBL protocols are usually performed on a special substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer) that has good electron-conducting properties necessary to prevent charging distortion. ,, However, a quartz-based substrate has poor conductive properties, which leads to the deflection of incoming electrons by surface charges and is a significant source of pattern-placement error. Therefore, to eliminate this drifting effect, a thin layer (20 nm) of ITO was sputter-coated onto the cover glass substrate to ensure electron-conductive properties. , This deposition successfully eliminated beam drifting on a sample surface coated with ITO and allowed the production of precise patterns of grid-lines of approximately 100 nm in width (Figure B), a resolution comparable to the EBL limits obtained with standard silicon-wafer surfaces .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard EBL protocols are usually performed on a special substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer) that has good electron-conducting properties necessary to prevent charging distortion. 70 , 72 , 73 However, a quartz-based substrate has poor conductive properties, which leads to the deflection of incoming electrons by surface charges and is a significant source of pattern-placement error. Therefore, to eliminate this drifting effect, a thin layer (20 nm) of ITO was sputter-coated onto the cover glass substrate to ensure electron-conductive properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallic nanostructures are generally fabricated by the top-down processes such as electron beam lithography (EBL) [19][20], focus ion beam (FIB) [21] or by the bottom-up processes such as like the self-organization methods [22][23] and anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) template [24] or by hybrid processes developed by our group [9][10][11][12]25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%