2020
DOI: 10.3791/60841-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of the Composite Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (C-RPNI) in the Adult Rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RPNI surgery has demonstrated its reliability and durability in harnessing neural signals for neuroprosthetic control. 35–44 Additionally, RPNI surgery is effective for treatment and prevention of postamputation pain, including both symptomatic neuroma pain and phantom limb pain. 59,64–68 In the authors’ practice, RPNI surgery has also been successful in management of neuromas of superficial sensory nerves particularly in cases of nerve autograft harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RPNI surgery has demonstrated its reliability and durability in harnessing neural signals for neuroprosthetic control. 35–44 Additionally, RPNI surgery is effective for treatment and prevention of postamputation pain, including both symptomatic neuroma pain and phantom limb pain. 59,64–68 In the authors’ practice, RPNI surgery has also been successful in management of neuromas of superficial sensory nerves particularly in cases of nerve autograft harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPNI was originally designed as an interface for advanced neural control of prosthetic devices and to overcome the limitations of current control strategies. 33–44 RPNI surgery was developed in response to the limitations of existing peripheral nerve electrodes that directly interface with fascicles but yield well-documented adverse sequelae. 35,45,46 Similarly, the use of surface electromyographic signals to drive a prosthetic limb has been associated with poor prosthetic performance.…”
Section: The Rationale For Rpnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, our group developed the RPNI to create an interface with greater signal specificity and long-term signal stability. 12,28 The muscle graft is reinnervated by the implanted nerve and reliably amplifies independent efferent motor action potentials from the transected motor nerve, which allows upper limb amputees real-time prosthetic finger control. 12,29 Furthermore, RPNIs prevent and treat neuroma pain and phantom limb pain in patients with limb loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DS-RPNI is a modification of our regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), which consists of a free muscle graft secured around the distal end of transected nerves. 12,28 Here, RPNI muscle grafts are reinnervated by regenerating axons from the transected nerve, and are capable of amplifying independent efferent motor action potentials to allow real-time prosthetic finger control. 11,29 The DS-RPNI consists of small deepithelialized skin grafts secured around fascicles of residual sensory nerves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a rat model, sensory interfaces transduced afferent compound sensory nerve action potentials similar to native skin 23. Further investigation is being conducted in integrating combined sensory and motor signals using composite RPNIs that consists of a free muscle graft and a free dermal graft secured around a mixed sensorimotor nerve 24. The implications of a stable and durable interface to integrate sensory and motor signals has immense potential to transform prosthetic rehabilitation for amputation patients.…”
Section: Rpnis and Prosthetic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%