2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of sulfur-doped biochar derived from tapioca peel waste with superior adsorption performance for the removal of Malachite green and Rhodamine B dyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 5, it was clear that the adsorption process of both dyes onto S-Fe NCs was through two main stages: the fast initial stage and the slower stage leading to equilibrium. This represents a typical process of adsorption, as available active sites decrease as time goes on and the adsorption reaches the maximum values (Vigneshwaran et al 2021). Another phenomenon could also be observed from the diagram that the adsorption capacity increased with increasing initial concentration, indicating a larger concentration gradient could be used to overcome the resistance to mass transfer during adsorption process.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…From Figure 5, it was clear that the adsorption process of both dyes onto S-Fe NCs was through two main stages: the fast initial stage and the slower stage leading to equilibrium. This represents a typical process of adsorption, as available active sites decrease as time goes on and the adsorption reaches the maximum values (Vigneshwaran et al 2021). Another phenomenon could also be observed from the diagram that the adsorption capacity increased with increasing initial concentration, indicating a larger concentration gradient could be used to overcome the resistance to mass transfer during adsorption process.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In a very similar investigation to the one above [ 54 ], the same adsorbent and dyes were used, though in this case [ 53 ], the dyes’ concentrations were 25 mg/L because the uptake was lower than in the previous reference, namely 30 mg/L versus 53 mg/g (malachite green) or 33 mg/g versus 41 mg/g (rhodamine B). Additionally, the best uptakes were yielded at a pH near 8 and after 120 min of reaction.…”
Section: Adsorbents For the Removal Of Cationic Dyes From Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a very similar investigation than above [71], the same adsorbent and dyes were used, though in this case [72], the dyes concentrations were 25 mg/L, and this is because dyes uptake were lower than in the previous reference, 30 mg/L versus 53 mg/g (malachite green) or 33 mg/g versus 41 mg/g (rhodamine B), also best uptakes were yielded at pH near 8 and after 120 min of reaction. The experimental data also followed the pseudosecond-order kineticmodel, but in this case, the adsorption fitted to the Freundlich isotherm instead of the Langmuir one.…”
Section: Table 6 Efficacy Of the Adsorbent After Cycles Of Adsorption-desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%