2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9071004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of Maghemite Nanoparticles with High Surface Area

Abstract: Maghemite nanoparticles with high surface area were obtained from the dehydroxylation of lepidocrocite prismatic nanoparticles. The synthesis pathway from the precursor to the porous maghemite nanoparticles is inexpensive, simple and gives high surface area values for both lepidocrocite and maghemite. The obtained maghemite nanoparticles contained intraparticle and interparticle pores with a surface area ca. 30 × 103 m2/mol, with pore volumes in the order of 70 cm3/mol. Both the surface area and pore volume de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last step changes at about 375 °C are due to the transformation of magnetite to hematite and maghemite, respectively. All three weight loss stages are in consistency with the results reported in the literature. The total weight loss for goethite and lepidocrocite was 13.3 and 11.3%, respectively. Comparison of weight loss values in each stage indicates that the most difference in weight losses of two adsorbents belongs to the dehydroxylation step, which suggests that goethite includes approximately 20% more hydroxyl groups than lepidocrocite.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The last step changes at about 375 °C are due to the transformation of magnetite to hematite and maghemite, respectively. All three weight loss stages are in consistency with the results reported in the literature. The total weight loss for goethite and lepidocrocite was 13.3 and 11.3%, respectively. Comparison of weight loss values in each stage indicates that the most difference in weight losses of two adsorbents belongs to the dehydroxylation step, which suggests that goethite includes approximately 20% more hydroxyl groups than lepidocrocite.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The primary purpose of this invention is to recover metal values from iron-containing waste materials and convert them to magnetic γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles having a wide range of applications from catalysis to waste management [ 9 , 10 ]. It is widely used for the production of, e.g., magnetic materials [ [11] , [12] , [13] ], sensing materials [ 14 ], pigments [ 15 ], sorbents [ 16 , 17 ], photocatalysts [ 16 ], storing data [ 18 ], for biomedical applications such as drug delivery [ 19 , 20 ], contrast agents for resonance imaging [ [21] , [22] , [23] ] and hyperthermia treatment [ 18 , 24 ], as well as being key components for adsorption and storage purposes [ 25 , 26 ]. Recently, iron oxides have been used in a huge amount as electrodes for sodium-ion, lithium-ion, and alkaline-ion batteries [ [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maghemite is a post-product of Fe 2+ -containing compounds, such as magnetite or titanomagnetite, made by erosion or controllable oxidation at lower temperatures [23]. These methods were considered to produce γ-Fe 2 O 3 in a proper particle size and surface area [24] in this study. The electronic structure of γ-Fe 2 O 3 suggests an n-type semiconductor due to vacancies in the valence band and a conduction band populated by electrons [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%