Materials and Device Characterization in Micromachining III 2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.395599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of graphite masks for deep and ultradeep x-ray lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mold insert for hot embossing was produced using the LIGA process. [43][44][45] The mold insert was used to hot emboss several microfluidic channels in polycarbonate substrates (Goodfellow, UK) using a PHI (City of Industry, CA) press equipped with a vacuum chamber. Inspection of SEM micrographs indicated that the sidewalls of the embossed channels were straight and smooth and contained the insert-defined channel width and height indicating minimal replication errors.…”
Section: Experimental Methods Cfpcr Device and Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mold insert for hot embossing was produced using the LIGA process. [43][44][45] The mold insert was used to hot emboss several microfluidic channels in polycarbonate substrates (Goodfellow, UK) using a PHI (City of Industry, CA) press equipped with a vacuum chamber. Inspection of SEM micrographs indicated that the sidewalls of the embossed channels were straight and smooth and contained the insert-defined channel width and height indicating minimal replication errors.…”
Section: Experimental Methods Cfpcr Device and Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon is a promising material, because it is conducting, generally inexpensive and non-toxic. Vitreous carbon was an interesting candidate over graphite, because it is known from earlier work that the graphite material used for mask substrates increases the surface sidewall roughness in the PMMA mold significantly, by an order of magnitude and vitreous carbon does not seem to do so (Desta et al 2000;Scheunemann et al 2003). Figure 6 shows a typical resist sidewall resulting from using graphite as a mask substrate compared to the same sidewall using a thin titanium mask ubstrate in Fig.…”
Section: Examples and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beryllium can be used as a mask material at thicknesses of hundreds of micrometers but the toxicity of the oxide requires special handling considerations and the material is relatively expensive (Toxicological Profile for Beryllium and Update 1993). Graphite substrates are commonly used for low cost masks since the substrate can be hundreds of micrometers thick, the material is readily available, and the conductivity of graphite facilitates electroplating of the gold absorber Desta et al 2000). However, microstructures made using graphite masks have striations on the microstructure sidewalls and sidewall surface roughness an order of magnitude higher than those made with titanium masks .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are inorganic materials, such as Si [13], SiC [14], and SiN [15], that are used on masks, and they are excellent in their dimensional stability and chemical resistance, but forming a thin layer on them is relatively a difficult task. In addition, an X-ray mask with a graphite membrane, of which the thermal resistance is same as that of an inorganic material, has also been made [16]. In the case of absorber materials, an Au [17] absorber, which can easily be manufactured by electroplating, has been employed by many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%