2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3213350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of graphene layers from multiwalled carbon nanotubes using high dc pulse

Abstract: Graphene layers are fabricated from multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with a high direct current pulse through a pulsed current sintering process. We confirm the transformation of the structure from MWCNTs to graphene layers. Graphene layers are analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy, high resolution Raman, and x-ray diffraction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the method was limited to nanoribbons formation on substrates. More recently, unzipping methods such as catalytic cutting 17 and high current pulse burning 18 have been reported, but the quality and yield of nanoribbons were unknown. Thus far, a method capable of producing large amounts of high quality nanoribbons is still lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method was limited to nanoribbons formation on substrates. More recently, unzipping methods such as catalytic cutting 17 and high current pulse burning 18 have been reported, but the quality and yield of nanoribbons were unknown. Thus far, a method capable of producing large amounts of high quality nanoribbons is still lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first sight, the spontaneous formation of CNTs from bilayer graphene nanoribbons is counterintuitive because this is the reverse of a known process in which CNTs can unzip to form GNRs. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] However, the experiments demonstrating the latter were performed on relatively wide-diameter CNTs, whereas in Ref. 41, it is noted that the formation of CNTs from free-standing bilayer graphene nanoribbons is energetically favored only for nanoribbons of width less than 3 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CNTs grown using arc discharge, laser ablation, or chemical vapor deposition typically possess a mixture of chiralities and the more exotic structures usually appear only by chance. On the other hand, the synthesis of graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) is more deterministic and can be achieved using lithographic, [9][10][11] chemical, [12][13][14][15] and sonochemical 16,17 techniques, unzipping CNTs [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and assembling GNRs from chemical precursors. 25 For example, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) lithography 26 can be used to cut GNRs with widths as small as 2.5 nm, with a specified chirality, a specified location, and with their ends contacted to (graphene) electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene-based sheets have been shown to be very promising for high-performance nanoelectronics, transparent conductors, polymer composites, and microscopy support, etc. Currently, various methods have been developed for production of graphene, including chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [3], micromechanical exfoliation of graphite [4], epitaxial growth on electrically insulating surfaces such as SiC [5], physical method [6], and chemical processing [7]. Among them, the chemical approach is the most suitable method for economically producing graphene sheets on a large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%