2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of core@shell structural Fe-Fe2O3@PHCP nanochains with high saturation magnetization and abundant amino groups for hexavalent chromium adsorption and reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the adsorption, the nanocomposite showed the appearance of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) peaks with molar ratios of 59.7% and 40.3%, respectively, meaning that the ppy electrons reduces the hexavalent chromium to the trivalent chromium and the adsorption process included both ions. This removal mechanism was described by many previous studies [55][56][57][58]. According to Figure 7b, N + , NH-, and N-peaks were observed with molar ratios equal to 13.8, 28.5, and 57.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussion On the Mechanism Of Removalsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…After the adsorption, the nanocomposite showed the appearance of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) peaks with molar ratios of 59.7% and 40.3%, respectively, meaning that the ppy electrons reduces the hexavalent chromium to the trivalent chromium and the adsorption process included both ions. This removal mechanism was described by many previous studies [55][56][57][58]. According to Figure 7b, N + , NH-, and N-peaks were observed with molar ratios equal to 13.8, 28.5, and 57.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussion On the Mechanism Of Removalsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Comparison of the maximum adsorption capacity toward Cr­(VI) among different adsorbents that are prepared in this work and reported in the literature: 1,, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption/ Figure 6. Comparison of the maximum adsorption capacity toward Cr(VI) among different adsorbents that are prepared in this work and reported in the literature: 1, 1 , 2, 42 3, 43 4, 18 5, 44 6, 45 7, 46 9, 47 10, 31 11, 38 12, 48 13, 49 The adsorption performance becoming worse with increasing adsorption/desorption measurements may be attributed to the irreversible reaction occurring between some active sites of the adsorbent and Cr(VI), 39 generating these active sites inability to be regenerated. In general, the adsorption capacity remains relatively stable, indicating that the CA-c-PEI membrane is a promising adsorbent with good regeneration ability.…”
Section: Morphology and Microstructure Of The Electrospun Porous Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, nitrogen atoms have a strong ability to accept electrons, and the carbon atoms adjacent to them generally carry net positive charges, which contribute to the Cr(VI) removal through electrostatic attraction [ 137 ]. Except that, hydrogen bond force, coordination interaction, cation exchange and chelating interaction, are also involved in the adsorption of Cr(VI) introduced by nitrogen-containing groups [ 64 , 143 ]. Because of the presence of electron-donating groups (e.g., amine/imine groups, carboxyl, hydroxyl, and phenol) in polymeric materials ( Table 1 ), the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) often occurs during the reactions between these adsorbents and Cr(VI).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Cr(vi) Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%