2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of carbon nanotube based transparent conductive thin films using layer-by-layer technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These SWNT thin films showed fairly high optical transmittance and good conducting properties which are similar to those of the conventional ITO-coated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET; 50-200 Ω resistance and~83% transmission at 550 nm) substrate [23]. However, these methods tend to exhibit some problems such as poor film surface, optoelectronic performance, high cost, and a complex process [24]. Transfer printing, one of the most-used thin film techniques, results in difficult large-area fabrication and relatively brittle SWNT thin films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These SWNT thin films showed fairly high optical transmittance and good conducting properties which are similar to those of the conventional ITO-coated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET; 50-200 Ω resistance and~83% transmission at 550 nm) substrate [23]. However, these methods tend to exhibit some problems such as poor film surface, optoelectronic performance, high cost, and a complex process [24]. Transfer printing, one of the most-used thin film techniques, results in difficult large-area fabrication and relatively brittle SWNT thin films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We are encouraged by this as at this stage the CNT synthesis process has not yet been optimized for the combination of optical transparency and electrical conductivity, nor have any post-processing treatments been Conductance against transparency for different nanotube films. Our own results (solid circles for free-standing, squares for polymer-backed) are compared against the results of Budhadipta et al [7] (upright triangles), Geng et al [6] (inverted triangles), Zhou et al [5] (diamonds), Ma et al [8] (left-pointing triangles), Kaempgen et al [15] (stars), Green and Hersam [16] (right-pointing triangles) and Yu et al [17] (empty circles).…”
Section: Transparency and Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Morphological analysis (in Figs. 3,4) showed that better filler dispersion and distribution with fewer amount of voids was observed in synthetic diamond system compared with graphene nanoplatelet composites. The increase in tensile strength was due to even distribution of stress from epoxy matrix to filler.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Types Of Fillers and Filler Loadingsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The addition of nanomaterials to polymers confers better mechanical and barrier properties to the composite and also increases electrical and thermal conductivity [3]. At present, commonly used thermally conductive fillers include carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon black, silicon nitride, graphite, silicon carbide, and synthetic diamond [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%