2011
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201102518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of Arbitrary Three‐Dimensional Polymer Structures by Rational Control of the Spacing between Nanobrushes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13,14] While progress has been made toward advanced brush architectures, current surface initiation strategies lack temporal and spatial control and, therefore, rely on a prepatterned initiator layer to template brush formation. Prepatterning has been demonstrated on a variety of substrates using top-down lithographic techniques, [15] such as photo-and interference lithography, [6] electron-beam lithography, [16][17][18] scanningprobe lithography, [19][20][21] and soft lithography. [22] In these cases, polymerization only occurs in regions where the initiator is present, resulting in patterned polymer brushes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14] While progress has been made toward advanced brush architectures, current surface initiation strategies lack temporal and spatial control and, therefore, rely on a prepatterned initiator layer to template brush formation. Prepatterning has been demonstrated on a variety of substrates using top-down lithographic techniques, [15] such as photo-and interference lithography, [6] electron-beam lithography, [16][17][18] scanningprobe lithography, [19][20][21] and soft lithography. [22] In these cases, polymerization only occurs in regions where the initiator is present, resulting in patterned polymer brushes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 As illustrated in Scheme 1, initiator-modified graphene/Cu was placed in a polymerization solution to grow polymer brushes via SI-ATRP. [23][24][25][26] Subsequently, the entire substrate was immersed in an iron (III) chloride aqueous solution to etch away the copper foil. After copious water rinsing, a freestanding and transparent polymer@graphene floating on the water/air interface could be clearly observed (Figure 1a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We envision that with more advanced patterning techniques and materials design, numerous polymer@graphene 2D objects with different functionalities will be developed in the near future. 21,26,27,[33][34][35][36] Polymer@graphene 2D objects T Gao et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the strong bonding between both substrate-ligand and ligand-metal, the resultant electrodes are highly stretchable. [133] Furthermore, patterned stretchable metal interconnects could be fabricated based on this strategy. Various printing methods, including dip-pen nanolithography (DPN, a scanning probe lithography technique that uses an atomic force microscopy (AFM) tip to create patterns with different inks), inkjet printing, and screen printing ( Figure 4b), could be applied to selectively deposited catalytic moieties to polymer brush modified substrates depending on the requirement of pattern resolution.…”
Section: Molecular Gluing Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%