Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of anatomically-shaped cartilage constructs using decellularized cartilage-derived matrix scaffolds

Abstract: The native extracellular matrix of cartilage contains entrapped growth factors as well as tissue-specific epitopes for cell-matrix interactions, which make it a potentially attractive biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering. A limitation to this approach is that the native cartilage extracellular matrix possesses a pore size of only a few nanometers, which inhibits cellular infiltration. Efforts to increase the pore size of cartilage-derived matrix (CDM) scaffolds dramatically attenuate their mechanical p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(174 reference statements)
7
85
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These constructs hold promise for restoring native tissue structure and function, and may be beneficial in terms of zone-to-zone integration with adjacent host tissue and providing more appropriate strain transfer after implantation. Future work will investigate how individual cells within each layer communicate with one another and with adjacent layers, and will scale this technology to produce constructs of anatomic relevance for cartilage repair applications [27, 28, 51]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These constructs hold promise for restoring native tissue structure and function, and may be beneficial in terms of zone-to-zone integration with adjacent host tissue and providing more appropriate strain transfer after implantation. Future work will investigate how individual cells within each layer communicate with one another and with adjacent layers, and will scale this technology to produce constructs of anatomic relevance for cartilage repair applications [27, 28, 51]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that insufficient soluble factor transport compromises and/or limits cell function in engineered constructs, ultimately resulting in inhomogeneous matrix accumulation [20, 24]. This issue is critical when considering scaling up to repair thicker cartilage regions (e.g., the femoral condyle) [23, 26] or larger defect areas (e.g., partial or total joint resurfacing) [27, 28]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies begin with an overall scan of such scaffolds using micro computed tomography (µCT), allowing for visualization of bulk scaffold shape as well as describing features down to 1 µm [70]. This non-destructive technique can be used to image through whole scaffolds without staining, slicing, or drying out, which is beneficial to many biologically built materials [7173].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Achieved Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aligned pores in both the DCC‐only and PLGA–DCC composite scaffolds guided the growth and orientation of the cells to mimic the structure of deep‐zone cartilage and enable cellular infiltration into the interior regions of the scaffold. Rowland et al . similarly adapted the decellularization procedure from Yang et al .…”
Section: Decellularized Cartilage Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%