2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra10921g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of anatase/rutile hierarchical nanospheres with enhanced n/p type gas sensing performance at room temperature

Abstract: Porous Pt decorated anatase/rutile sensing nanospheres with high crystallinity and large surface area synthesized through psHT treatment present enhanced sensitivity and selectivity to VOCs vapor at room temperature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kang et al claimed that the conduction band minimum of anatase was found to be about 0.2 eV higher than that of rutile, which indicated that the electron more likely transferred from anatase to rutile [21]. (ii) Conversely, recently in the second hypothesis, some experimental as well as theoretical works proposed that both bands of rutile lie higher than of the anatase phase, so in mixed systems the holes are accumulated in the rutile, while the electrons transfer to anatase phase [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kang et al claimed that the conduction band minimum of anatase was found to be about 0.2 eV higher than that of rutile, which indicated that the electron more likely transferred from anatase to rutile [21]. (ii) Conversely, recently in the second hypothesis, some experimental as well as theoretical works proposed that both bands of rutile lie higher than of the anatase phase, so in mixed systems the holes are accumulated in the rutile, while the electrons transfer to anatase phase [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selectivity is one of the most important parameters of the sensing properties of the gas sensor. The selectivity of the sensor was calculated using the following formula: 27,28 where S i is the response of gas for which the relative is to be estimated. The responses were found to be ∼45.63%, ∼33.91%, and ∼20.46% for propanol, ethanol, and acetone, respectively, which is displayed in the histogram (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%