2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0053792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of a silicon μDicer for uniform microdissection of tissue samples

Abstract: Generating uniform tissue microfragments is important in many applications, including disease diagnostics, drug screening, spatial-omics, and fundamental wound healing and tissue regeneration studies. Common mechanical dissection methods, such as manual mincing, are imprecise and result in fragments with a broad range in size. This work aims to develop a microscale dicing device, referred to as the “μDicer,” consisting of a hollow array of blades spaced hundreds of micrometers apart. A tissue pushed through th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limiting factor in microfluidic sectioning in a pure PDMS system is the ability of the PDMS blade to pierce stiff biological samples, as PDMS is relatively soft (Young’s modulus ∼ 2 MPa). , While noncontact hydrodynamic methods may be able to alleviate this issue simply by increasing the flow rate, another solution is to use a stiff material such as silicon (Young’s modulus ∼ 140 GPa) to fabricate the blades, as shown in the Biogrid by Wallman et al . Several other studies have devised silicon grids with sharp edges that can cut samples into 100–200 μm sized pieces. , However, they were not demonstrated on live samples and did not leverage microfluidic methods. An alternative approach is to utilize in situ direct laser writing to fabricate a blade structure made of a stiff photoresist (e.g., the Nanoscribe IP series photoresist has a Young’s modulus ∼ 1–4 GPa) directly inside a microfluidic channel .…”
Section: Sectioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limiting factor in microfluidic sectioning in a pure PDMS system is the ability of the PDMS blade to pierce stiff biological samples, as PDMS is relatively soft (Young’s modulus ∼ 2 MPa). , While noncontact hydrodynamic methods may be able to alleviate this issue simply by increasing the flow rate, another solution is to use a stiff material such as silicon (Young’s modulus ∼ 140 GPa) to fabricate the blades, as shown in the Biogrid by Wallman et al . Several other studies have devised silicon grids with sharp edges that can cut samples into 100–200 μm sized pieces. , However, they were not demonstrated on live samples and did not leverage microfluidic methods. An alternative approach is to utilize in situ direct laser writing to fabricate a blade structure made of a stiff photoresist (e.g., the Nanoscribe IP series photoresist has a Young’s modulus ∼ 1–4 GPa) directly inside a microfluidic channel .…”
Section: Sectioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolation of specific cells in biological tissues is the basis for studying the gene expression of heterogeneous cells and further understanding biological functions or disease mechanisms [ 11 ]. Laser capture microdissection is a powerful technique that enables precise extraction of cells from a tissue slice [ 12 ]. At present, nanosecond laser pulses are commonly used in commercial laser microdissection systems for cell separation [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%