2007
DOI: 10.1039/b712687e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of a nanoparticle gradient substrate by thermochemical manipulation of an ester functionalized SAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy, between molecular length and SAM thickness, is expected and is in agreement with the literature, being ascribed to both the tilt angle and density of the SAM surfactants. 22,23 The advancing (y Adv ) and receding (y Rec ) contact angles for AzoSS (E901 and E751, respectively) and AzoSH (E901 and E801, respectively) are in good agreement with the literature 24,25 for tert-butyl ester SAMs, noting that the final hysteresis values (y Adv -y Adv ) of AzoSS (B151) are slightly larger than AzoSH (101) indicating a less dense packed SAM for AzoSS. XPS analysis confirms the presence of the elemental species N, C, O and S on the AzoSS SAMs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This discrepancy, between molecular length and SAM thickness, is expected and is in agreement with the literature, being ascribed to both the tilt angle and density of the SAM surfactants. 22,23 The advancing (y Adv ) and receding (y Rec ) contact angles for AzoSS (E901 and E751, respectively) and AzoSH (E901 and E801, respectively) are in good agreement with the literature 24,25 for tert-butyl ester SAMs, noting that the final hysteresis values (y Adv -y Adv ) of AzoSS (B151) are slightly larger than AzoSH (101) indicating a less dense packed SAM for AzoSS. XPS analysis confirms the presence of the elemental species N, C, O and S on the AzoSS SAMs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition to the functional group density and wettability gradients, a gradient in nanoscale thickness of the substrate usually develops following the graft copolymerization, where the grafted polymer shows a transition from a loosely packed “mushroom” regime to a densely packed “brush” regime 78. Other creative methods utilized to fabricate wettability gradient surfaces include diffusive deposition from a vapor or liquid phase absorbent (organosilanes) to hydrophilic substrates,7983 a density gradient method,84 spatially varying electrochemical desorption/adsorption of alkanethiols on gold electrodes,45 hyperthermal polyatomic ion deposition,85 atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) (grafting from initiator gradients generated via diffusion,86,87 continuous depletion of monomer solution86,88), thermochemical manipulation of aliphatic tert-butyl ester–functionalized self-assembled monolayers, 89 and continuous immersion techniques (polyvinyl carbonate films in NaOH solution,44 gold substrate in alka-nethiol solutions,90 gradient chemisorption in ATRP initiator solution,78 and a metal oxide substrate into a solution of polycationic polymer [electrostatic interaction]) 91. These methods result in a gradient in surface functional group density that can generally be translated into gradients in polymer grafting density (or molecular weight), surface nanoparticle density (by covalent or charge92,93 interactions), and/or immobilized bioactive factor density.…”
Section: Polymeric Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend observed is very interesting. As discussed earlier the reported pK a of aliphatic -COOH and aliphatic secondary -NH 2 is 4-5 32,33 and 11, 34,35 respectively, hence it would be expected that the negative charge on the Au nanoparticles would increase with increasing pH due to the presence of -COOH moieties which will become more deprotonated with increasing pH and the underlying -NH 2 moieties will become less protonated as the pH increases. Therefore it would be envisaged that the zeta potential would decrease with increasing pH.…”
Section: The Success Of the Coating Determined Via Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the charge of the surfaces will be sensitive to the pH of medium as the pK a of the functional groups present (-CO 2 H or -NH 2 ) will determine whether the groups are protonated or deprotonated and thus whether the surface is charged (-CO 2or -+ NH 3 ) or neutral (-CO 2 H or -NH ). [29][30][31] The reported pK a of aliphatic carboxylic acids is 4-5 32,33 and aliphatic secondary amine is 11 in free aqueous solution. 34,35 However, it is well documented that the pK a of aliphatic acids and amine which are bound to a surface such as Au and silica substrate to form a self-assembled monolayer are different to what is observed in free solution.…”
Section: The Success Of the Coating Determined Via Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%