Volume 10: Micro- And Nano-Systems Engineering and Packaging 2015
DOI: 10.1115/imece2015-50657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of 2.5D Rock-Based Micromodels With High Resolution Features

Abstract: Fabrication of 2.5D rock-based micromodels with high resolution features is presented using SU-8 multi-layer lithography and nickel electroforming for nickel molds. Processes associated with SU-8 were carefully optimized by the use of the vacuum contact, the use of UV filter, and controls of UV exposure doses and baking times. The use of SU-8 MicroSpray enabled the easy fabrication of multi-layers of SU-8, while exhibiting some total thickness variations. The thirteen layered SU-8 samples showed reliable patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies are needed to fully characterize such multiphase flow problems where the timescales involved in phase change and bulk flow are comparable. In addition, using micromodels that represent complex geometries of heterogeneous rocks, such as the multiple-scale pore sizes , and fractures, is highly encouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are needed to fully characterize such multiphase flow problems where the timescales involved in phase change and bulk flow are comparable. In addition, using micromodels that represent complex geometries of heterogeneous rocks, such as the multiple-scale pore sizes , and fractures, is highly encouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneering work from Wan et al (1996) improved the glass micromodel design and fabrication to provide the necessary contrast of depths (thus capillarity) between matrix pores and fracture apertures. In recent years, more 2.5‐D micromodels have been used to better mimic real 3‐D porous media and investigate multiphase flow (Park et al, 2015; Yun et al, 2017; Xu, Bonnecaze, et al, 2017; Xu, Liang, et al, 2017). To our best knowledge, there are few studies on unstable drainage processes in micromodels having 2.5‐D pore geometry heterogeneity, especially for GCS applications, and none that have examined impacts of mixed wetting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%