“…Although the R P of the BSFBi0.3 cathode is slightly lower at 600 C, the SBCC cathode cell possesses a far superior power output. Clearly, the SBCC cathode reveals the lowest R P at 700 C and better polarization performance than most reported cathode materials at 600 C. In addition, the power performance is also much better than that of many recent modied cobalt-containing cathodes, e.g., Ba 0.4 K 0.1 Sr 0.5 Co 0.8 -Fe 0.2 O 3Àd , 52 LaNi 0.6 Fe 0.4 O 3Àd -Sm 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3Àd (7 : 3 wt%), 53 Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 0.7 Fe 0.2 Mo 0.1 O 3Àd , 54 Pr 0.5 Ba 0.5 (Co 0.7 Fe 0.275 W 0.025 ) O 3Àd , 55 and La 0.5 Sr 0.5 Mn 0.9 Co 0.1 O 3Àd -BaZr 0.8 Y 0.2 O 3Àd , 56 which afford PPDs of 1275, 1427, 1217, 1100 and 1359 mW cm À2 at 700 C. In fact, the utilization of a thin interlayer obtained by PLD to optimize the cathode/electrolyte interface has been attempted in the literature, e.g., Pergolesi et al 31 adopted 100 nm thick porous La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3Àd lms, achieving the largest reported PPD of 110 mW cm À2 at 600 C for BaZr 0.8 Y 0.2 O 3Àd -based cells ten years ago. Recently, Choi et al 9 employed a dense thin ($100 nm) PrBa 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 1.5 Fe 0.5 O 5+d interlayer onto the electrolyte BaZr 0.4 Ce 0.4 Y 0.1 Yb 0.1 O 3 surface to mitigate the contact resistance, giving evidence that the interlayer could advance the interfacial reaction.…”