Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Inorganic solid electrolytes, in comparison with their liquid counterparts, have more potential in varioust ypes of batteries due to their dual roles of ion transportation and separation. For all-solid-state batteries, solide lectrolytes bring several advantages, [1][2][3][4][5][6] such as enhanced safety,i ncreased energy density,s olid device integration, and packaging;t hese expand the operation temperature range and potentially improve cycling stabilitya nd lifetime. Moreover,i norganic solid electrolytes are also beneficial for lithium-ion batteries and lithium-air batteries, in which they functiona se ither surface modification layers or lithium-ion conductors. [7,8] In principle, ideal solid electrolytes are expected to have several features: [9][10][11][12][13][14] 1) fast ion dynamics and negligible electronic conductivity (minimum ionic conductivity of 10 À4 Scm À1 at room temperature for practical consideration);2 )a wide electrochemical potential window for battery cycling;3 )ane xceptional mechanical strength to suppress lithium dendrite growth;4 )excellent thermal stability during the cycling processes;and 5) asimple and low cost synthetic process for large-scale applications.Generally,i norganic lithium superionic conductors are divided into three categories:o xides, sulfides, and phosphates. Suc-cessfule xamples in oxidesi nclude garnet oxides, [15,16] perovskite-type oxides, [17,18] and antiperovskite oxides. [19][20][21] Sulfide solid electrolytes include Li 2 SÀP 2 S 5 , [22,23] Li 3 PS 4 , [24][25][26] Li 7 P 3 S 11 , [27,28] Li 7 PS 6 ,a nd Li 6 PS 5 X( X = Cl, Br). [29][30][31] Popular phosphate solid electrolytes include sodium superionic conductor (NaSICON)structured lithium-ion conductors, [32][33][34][35][36] such as LiTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (LTP), Li 1 + x Al x Ti 2Àx (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP), and Li 1 + x Al x Ge 2Àx (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP). Many exciting discoveries of these materials have been summarized in important review papers. [2,6,[37][38][39][40] NaSICON-type solid electrolytes, such as LATP and LAGP, have marked advantages compared with sulfides and oxides: they display chemicals tabilityi na ir and/or water,a re low cost and low toxicity,a nd have great electrochemical stability with the added benefito fe asy preparation. [2,36,38] They also exhibit attractive ionic conductivities of 10 À4 -10 À3 Scm À1 at room temperature. Such features have recently caused renewed interest in these NaSICON-structured materials and much effort has been devoted to the investigation of this type of solid electrolyte, especiallyL ATPa nd LAGP.T his manuscript reviewsr ecent progress in LATP and LAGP solid electrolytes, with as pecific focus on synthetic approaches and their effects on the crystal structures, conductive properties, and applications. Herein, general synthetic methods for LATP and LAGP solid electrolytes are first introduced, followed by ac omparison of the crystal structures, phase purities, and ionic conductivities that result from different approaches. Later,t he applications of LATP and LAGP in ful...
Inorganic solid electrolytes, in comparison with their liquid counterparts, have more potential in varioust ypes of batteries due to their dual roles of ion transportation and separation. For all-solid-state batteries, solide lectrolytes bring several advantages, [1][2][3][4][5][6] such as enhanced safety,i ncreased energy density,s olid device integration, and packaging;t hese expand the operation temperature range and potentially improve cycling stabilitya nd lifetime. Moreover,i norganic solid electrolytes are also beneficial for lithium-ion batteries and lithium-air batteries, in which they functiona se ither surface modification layers or lithium-ion conductors. [7,8] In principle, ideal solid electrolytes are expected to have several features: [9][10][11][12][13][14] 1) fast ion dynamics and negligible electronic conductivity (minimum ionic conductivity of 10 À4 Scm À1 at room temperature for practical consideration);2 )a wide electrochemical potential window for battery cycling;3 )ane xceptional mechanical strength to suppress lithium dendrite growth;4 )excellent thermal stability during the cycling processes;and 5) asimple and low cost synthetic process for large-scale applications.Generally,i norganic lithium superionic conductors are divided into three categories:o xides, sulfides, and phosphates. Suc-cessfule xamples in oxidesi nclude garnet oxides, [15,16] perovskite-type oxides, [17,18] and antiperovskite oxides. [19][20][21] Sulfide solid electrolytes include Li 2 SÀP 2 S 5 , [22,23] Li 3 PS 4 , [24][25][26] Li 7 P 3 S 11 , [27,28] Li 7 PS 6 ,a nd Li 6 PS 5 X( X = Cl, Br). [29][30][31] Popular phosphate solid electrolytes include sodium superionic conductor (NaSICON)structured lithium-ion conductors, [32][33][34][35][36] such as LiTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (LTP), Li 1 + x Al x Ti 2Àx (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP), and Li 1 + x Al x Ge 2Àx (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP). Many exciting discoveries of these materials have been summarized in important review papers. [2,6,[37][38][39][40] NaSICON-type solid electrolytes, such as LATP and LAGP, have marked advantages compared with sulfides and oxides: they display chemicals tabilityi na ir and/or water,a re low cost and low toxicity,a nd have great electrochemical stability with the added benefito fe asy preparation. [2,36,38] They also exhibit attractive ionic conductivities of 10 À4 -10 À3 Scm À1 at room temperature. Such features have recently caused renewed interest in these NaSICON-structured materials and much effort has been devoted to the investigation of this type of solid electrolyte, especiallyL ATPa nd LAGP.T his manuscript reviewsr ecent progress in LATP and LAGP solid electrolytes, with as pecific focus on synthetic approaches and their effects on the crystal structures, conductive properties, and applications. Herein, general synthetic methods for LATP and LAGP solid electrolytes are first introduced, followed by ac omparison of the crystal structures, phase purities, and ionic conductivities that result from different approaches. Later,t he applications of LATP and LAGP in ful...
Polyethylene oxide (PEO) solid electrolytes are regarded as a promising candidate for all‐solid‐state lithium batteries owing to their high safety and interfacial compatibility. However, PEO electrolyte is plagued by relatively weak structural strength and unsatisfactory Li+ conductivity. Herein, a mechanically strong and Li+ conductively favorable cellulosic scaffold of PEO is fabricated through amino (‐NH2) modification and g‐C3N4 (CN) incorporation of bacterial cellulose (BC) under a microbial circumstance. The biologically ‐NH2 modified BC (B‐NBC) is entangled with CN nanosheets (CN@B‐NBC) through an in situ secretion of nanocellulose followed by hydrogen bond‐induced self‐assembly. The ‐NH2 groups from B‐NBC weaken the complexation of Li+ with its counterpart, thus facilitating the release of more free Li+. CN with strong C‐N covalence and extra lone electrons of N further strengthens the BC skeleton and meanwhile offers sufficient anchors for Li+ migration. After infiltrating by LiTFSI/PEO (LP), the LP/CN@B‐NBC composite solid electrolyte (CSE) exhibits high lithium transference number and ionic conductivity. Upon coupling with LiFePO4 cathode, the full battery exhibits a remarkably high specific capacity, superior rate capability, and decent cycling stability. This work pioneers the attempts of chemical decoration and ingredient incorporation of BC architecture in CSE with the aid of a bottom‐up biosynthetic avenue.
Solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) play a crucial role in developing lithium metal batteries (LMBs) with high safety and energy density. Exploring SSEs with excellent comprehensive performance is the key to achieving the practical application of LMBs. In this work, we demonstrate the great potential of Li0.95Na0.05FePO4 (LNFP) as an ideal SSE due to its enhanced ionic conductivity and reliable stability in contact with lithium metal anode. Moreover, LNFP‐based composite solid electrolytes (CSEs) are prepared to further improve electronic insulation and interface stability. The CSE containing 50 wt% of LNFP (LNFP50) shows high ionic conductivity (3.58 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 25 °C) and good compatibility with Li metal anode and cathodes. Surprisingly, the LMB of Li|LNFP50|LiFePO4 cell at 0.5 C current density shows good cycling stability (151.5 mAh g−1 for 500 cycles, 96.5% capacity retention, and 99.3% Coulombic efficiency), and high‐energy LMB of Li|LNFP50|Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 cell maintains 80% capacity retention after 170 cycles, which are better than that with traditional liquid electrolytes (LEs). This investigation offers a new approach to commercializing SSEs with excellent comprehensive performance for high‐performance LMBs.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.