2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and analysis of cylindrical resin AFM microcantilevers

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this paper a new method of fabricating cylindrical resin microcantilevers using the Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM) technique of Micro-stereolithography (MSL) is described. The method is rapid and commercially viable, allowing the fabrication of atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilevers which exhibit much larger spring constants than those currently commercial available. This allows for experimentation in a force regime orders of magnitude higher than currently possible using the AFM. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, rigid-framed systems such as mechanical testers employ load cells that will have spring constants on the order 10 5 N/m and greater. Additionally, AFM cantilevers made from photocurable resin have been manufactured using Direct Digital Manufacturing, 75 exhibiting spring constants of the order 100À 1000 N/m, which allows beams in the μN to mN force regimes to be used in AFM. Hence, F peak * was calculated as a function of Ca for different values of k using both the capillary-viscous and capillary-nonlinear viscoelastic models.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rigid-framed systems such as mechanical testers employ load cells that will have spring constants on the order 10 5 N/m and greater. Additionally, AFM cantilevers made from photocurable resin have been manufactured using Direct Digital Manufacturing, 75 exhibiting spring constants of the order 100À 1000 N/m, which allows beams in the μN to mN force regimes to be used in AFM. Hence, F peak * was calculated as a function of Ca for different values of k using both the capillary-viscous and capillary-nonlinear viscoelastic models.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%