2015
DOI: 10.4188/jte.61.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabric Hand, Quality, Aesthetic and Preference of Textiles through Sensory Evaluation

Abstract: Through sensory evaluation, the fabric hands and values of various textiles were ascertained. The relationship between fabric hands and values were also investigated. Two sensory evaluations, comprising of a visual evaluation and visual with tactile (visual-tactile) evaluation, were carried out using verbal expressions that people generally use. When asked to give their judgement about the quality and aesthetics of the textiles used in this study, most of the subjects shared common views. Some of fabric hands … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to develop this evaluation method, human subjective responses (dependent variables) need to be collected and correlated with physical measures (independent variables) from designated sensors. This method is a basic method of quantifying or translating subjective responses to physical measures, and many previous works used this approach [ 5 , 11 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. One of the extensions of this method is to construct a hierarchy of stages of subjective responses, for example, by classifying subjective responses into two categories, which are sensorial and affective responses [ 21 ].…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to develop this evaluation method, human subjective responses (dependent variables) need to be collected and correlated with physical measures (independent variables) from designated sensors. This method is a basic method of quantifying or translating subjective responses to physical measures, and many previous works used this approach [ 5 , 11 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. One of the extensions of this method is to construct a hierarchy of stages of subjective responses, for example, by classifying subjective responses into two categories, which are sensorial and affective responses [ 21 ].…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems’ inputs are integrated and weighted in unique ways that lead to a complex human haptic perception which has a variety of factors at multiple levels of processing [ 8 ]. Previous works can be roughly classified into two categories by looking to the type of samples that are used in the product’s evaluation: (1) works that used samples that were taken from the outer layer of an object [ 5 , 11 ] or cut off small part from the object [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]; and (2) works that used the final end-product as the samples [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The latter type of sample may help us to include information from both of the two modalities (kinesthetic and cutaneous); not only the surface texture but also the tension, shape, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects evaluated the tactile sensation of each sample and immediately wrote their result for each sample on the evaluation sheet provided. A semantic differential method of 7-step evaluation based on the reference [8][9][10] was used. The subjects chose one answer from each of the 16 pairs of evaluation words for tactile sensation for each of the three samples using a mark sheet.…”
Section: Kansei Evaluation Methods (1) Experimental Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tactile sensation can also be investigated by wearable tactile sensors, artificial fingers or subjective sensory tests. 7,10,14,20–24 Considering the number of trials required, the investigation of tactile comfort by trained or untrained participants via sensory tests is more time consuming and difficult when compared to objective measurements, yet subjective evaluation of tactile comfort is quite common and essential for scientific researches. Bertaux et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roughness and the prickle of textile surfaces were evaluated by a panel in two different blind subjective tests and the findings were compared with the objective measurements of surface friction. Kitaguchi and Sukigara 22 suggested two sensory evaluations, comprising a visual evaluation and a visual with tactile evaluation, which were carried out using verbal expressions. It was reported that concepts like “high-grade” and “feels beautiful/fine” were associated with fabric properties such as bending, compression and surface friction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%