2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabric defect detection based on GLCM and Gabor filter: A comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Grey level co-occurrence matrix, one of the best promising methods for texture analysis, estimates image properties related to second-order statistics [14]. And it is the basis of analysing local pattern and the pixel arrangement rules of images [15].…”
Section: Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grey level co-occurrence matrix, one of the best promising methods for texture analysis, estimates image properties related to second-order statistics [14]. And it is the basis of analysing local pattern and the pixel arrangement rules of images [15].…”
Section: Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,[19][20][21] An important property of Gabor filters is that they achieve optimal joint localization (or resolution) in both the spatial and frequency domains. 22) In the spatial domain, the Gabor function is a complex exponential modulated by a Gaussian function. The general form of the two-dimensional (2D) Gabor function is given by:…”
Section: Filtering For Pattern Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image segmentation is an indispensable step for most popular defect detection methods, including statistical methods, 2-9 model-based methods, [10][11][12] and frequency spectral methods. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In all of these methods, the determination and location of defects depends on image segmentation. That is, almost all surface defect detection methods must segment each image to be inspected before determining whether the product is defective or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%