2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-020-02040-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabric defect detection based on low-rank decomposition with structural constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 4(e) and (f), the noise term can suppress the generation of noisy point. Thus, adding the noise term is important for improving the robustness of the model. As indicated in previous work, 2226,30 current models mainly focus on the improvement of the sparse term, but ignore the efficiency of the model. In the optimization procedure, SVD used per iteration costs a lot of time.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure 4(e) and (f), the noise term can suppress the generation of noisy point. Thus, adding the noise term is important for improving the robustness of the model. As indicated in previous work, 2226,30 current models mainly focus on the improvement of the sparse term, but ignore the efficiency of the model. In the optimization procedure, SVD used per iteration costs a lot of time.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, some methods added an extra regularizer to the RPCA model. 25,26 Although, these methods can achieve lower false alarm levels, they all need an extra loop to solve the regularizer, which hinders the overall efficiency. The above low-rank models use the nuclear norm as the surrogate of rank, in the optimization process, the different singular values shrink equally by subtracting a constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1–3 Automated defect detection methods include traditional vision methods and deep learning methods. The original traditional vision methods include Gabor filtering, 4 low-rank decomposition, 5 etc. With the development of deep learning, methods such as object detection 6–8 and semantic segmentation 9,10 are gradually applied to the field of defect detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Traditional automatic fabric defect detection methods are mainly dependent on the hand-collected features to distinguish defective and defect-free regions, including statistical methods, 7,8 structural methods, 9,10 spectrum methods, [11][12][13][14] and model-based methods. [15][16][17] Unfortunately, these traditional fabric defect detection algorithms cannot exactly and effectively identify diverse kinds of fabric defects because of the poor recognition capability of handcrafted defect features or the time-consuming sliding window strategy. In addition, these traditional methods are usually followed by the poor adaptability and generalization as they lack high-level semantic information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%