2019
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2019.2897054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F2D2: A Block-Coil Short-Model Dipole Toward FCC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the benefit provided in terms of hot-spot temperature and voltage-to-ground reduces the constraints of the superconducting coils themselves. For example, introducing Secondary CLIQ to FCC-type block-type coils may obviate the need for grading (see for example [46]) inside the superconducting coil. Given that graded superconducting coils come with constraints that are not present for the secondary coils described here (for example, all superconducting coils have to produce a magnetic field with a very high field quality and joints are needed between the graded sections), replacing a graded with an ungraded coil design in combination with Secondary CLIQ may reduce the overall complexity of the design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the benefit provided in terms of hot-spot temperature and voltage-to-ground reduces the constraints of the superconducting coils themselves. For example, introducing Secondary CLIQ to FCC-type block-type coils may obviate the need for grading (see for example [46]) inside the superconducting coil. Given that graded superconducting coils come with constraints that are not present for the secondary coils described here (for example, all superconducting coils have to produce a magnetic field with a very high field quality and joints are needed between the graded sections), replacing a graded with an ungraded coil design in combination with Secondary CLIQ may reduce the overall complexity of the design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. MAGNET MODELS Models of different design options (CEA (block-type, around 10 coils [42]), INFN (cos-theta, 6 coils), CIEMAT (common-coil, 6 coils), PSI (CCT) and BINP (different designs under study)) are being considered to be built and tested in the period until 2022-2025.…”
Section: H Coil Randdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programs are tackling the main R&D issues in preparation for the large use of high-field Nb 3 Sn magnets in a particle accelerator, from conductor development to the training performance and design options. Block type (Felice et al 2019), common coil (Toral et al 2018), cos-theta (Valente et al 2018;Zlobin et al 2018), and canted cos-theta (Caspi et al 2017;Montenero et al 2019) are being studied as design options for twin-aperture dipole magnets accessing the 16 T field range. As a magnet's cost is heavily dependent on the amount of conductor used, for a large number of magnets the cos-theta and block coil options would be preferable because, for the same margin on the load line, they are more efficient than the other two options.…”
Section: Present Development Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%