2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F154. Machine learning for the analysis of single pulse stimulation in electrocorticography

Abstract: were localized to-hippocampus, amygdala hippocampus, hippocampus-temporal pole, ant. Cingulum, superior temporal gyrus, and frontal operculum. With direct CS, 7 (54%) had typical seizures (aura followed by seizures with impaired awareness), 4 (31%) had atypical seizures (aura and clonic activity), and 2 (15%) had both types. Localization of CS-induced seizures overlapped with spontaneous seizures in 9/13 (70%) patients. Overlapping was 100% with mesial temporal structures. 7 (54%) patients underwent surgery, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning for DRs can be applied in the time-frequency or time domain. Using the same time-frequency images as used for visual examination, two different machine learning methods showed promising results, especially for spikes and riples [164]. Compared to the inter-observer agreement between two humans, the agreement between human and machine was similar for both methods in the spike and ripple bands [165].…”
Section: Examination Of Drsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning for DRs can be applied in the time-frequency or time domain. Using the same time-frequency images as used for visual examination, two different machine learning methods showed promising results, especially for spikes and riples [164]. Compared to the inter-observer agreement between two humans, the agreement between human and machine was similar for both methods in the spike and ripple bands [165].…”
Section: Examination Of Drsmentioning
confidence: 99%