1963
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300003402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-prime transfer and multiplication of sexduced cells

Abstract: A variable delay among mating pairs in the time between contact formation and the initiation ofFtransfer was found. The conjugation process has no effect on the multiplication of the recipient cell.In liquid medium newly infectingF-particles multiply faster than the host cell.The experiment strongly suggests that the number of episomes per cell is small and that the distribution of theF-factor among the daughter cells is non-random.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on August 9, 2020 by guest http://jb.asm.org/ Downloaded from WALKER AND PITTARD at 32 C. It can be seen that the curve shows no "plateau" region which would represent completion of transfer in the pairs formed in the first 5 min, as is found in classical entry curves using Hfr donors and allowing 5 min for pair formation (9). The low cell density in the dilution flask (about 105 per ml) precludes the possibility of pairs forming after the dilution step; thus, the continued increase of Ilv+ recombinants with time must reflect the ability of the F ilv merogenote to replicate in the zygote population without requiring integration (10). This is in contrast to the transfer of a chromosomal marker by an Hfr, where multiplication of recombinants cannot occur until after the donor marker has been integrated in the recipient chromosome.…”
Section: Vol 100 1969 321mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…on August 9, 2020 by guest http://jb.asm.org/ Downloaded from WALKER AND PITTARD at 32 C. It can be seen that the curve shows no "plateau" region which would represent completion of transfer in the pairs formed in the first 5 min, as is found in classical entry curves using Hfr donors and allowing 5 min for pair formation (9). The low cell density in the dilution flask (about 105 per ml) precludes the possibility of pairs forming after the dilution step; thus, the continued increase of Ilv+ recombinants with time must reflect the ability of the F ilv merogenote to replicate in the zygote population without requiring integration (10). This is in contrast to the transfer of a chromosomal marker by an Hfr, where multiplication of recombinants cannot occur until after the donor marker has been integrated in the recipient chromosome.…”
Section: Vol 100 1969 321mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Normally, two F' elements cannot coexist in the same cell (1)(2)(3), and similarly, replication of an F' element is inhibited in an Hfr strain (1,4,5). This property is called incompatibility and may stem from the same control mechanism that limits the number of copies of an F' element to 1-2 per chromosome (6,7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plates were also supplemented with histidine and proline, two amino acids required by the recipient. Colonies that grew after incubation at 28 C were candidates for containing an episome produced by the fusion of FilO rill and Flsf2lac+ because growth on this medium required the argE+, met+, and pur+ genes from FilO rif as well as the lac+ gene from Fts62lac+, and also because only one F' factor can exist stably in a cell (9,33). Although deletion of some DNA seems to occur during episomal fusion, probably because of the incompatibility of two sets of F replication genes (37), the rifr gene should be on the fused episome because rif lies between argE+ and pur+, two genes required for growth on the selective plates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%