2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.03.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

f–f oscillator strengths, hypersensitivity, branching ratios and quantum efficiencies discussed in the light of forgotten results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case for the Eu 3+ ion. systems with the same value for the  2 parameter do not necessarily show the same intensity for the hypersensitive transitions, because also the value of the refractive index n has to be taken in to account via the Lorentz local field correction (see equation 15): the higher the refractive index, the more intense the transitions become [737].…”
Section: Hypersensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case for the Eu 3+ ion. systems with the same value for the  2 parameter do not necessarily show the same intensity for the hypersensitive transitions, because also the value of the refractive index n has to be taken in to account via the Lorentz local field correction (see equation 15): the higher the refractive index, the more intense the transitions become [737].…”
Section: Hypersensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Judd−Ofelt parametrization scheme works remarkably well for ions like Nd 3+ , Er 3+ , and Ho 3+ but is more difficult to apply for Pr 3+ . The fact that the Judd−Ofelt theory does not produce well the intensities of Pr 3+ spectra has been the subject of much debate. A special case is Eu 3+ , where the τ R can be determined without knowledge of the intensity parameters using the Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission A of the magnetic dipole transition 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 , the refractive index n , and the ratio of the total integrated intensity to the integrated intensity of the 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 transition …”
Section: Luminescence Of Lanthanide Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the Judd-Ofelt theory does not produce well the intensities of Pr 3+ spectra has been the subject of much debate. [75][76][77][78] A special case is Eu 3+ , where the τ R can be determined without knowledge of the intensity parameters using the Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission A of the magnetic dipole transition 5 D 0 f 7 F 1 , the refractive index n, and the ratio of the total integrated intensity to the integrated intensity of the 5 D 0 f 7 F 1 transition. 70 The overall quantum yield, Φ tot , can be experimentally measured, but the determination of reliable values is not an easy task.…”
Section: Principles Of Lanthanide Luminescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to metallic nanoparticles, melting point depression and superheating of nanocrystals might also be expected [30]. It is well known that the upconversion (UPC) process or APTE (standing for 'addition de photon par transferts d'energie') described by Auzel in [31] may obey the Stokes rule and take place between two adjacent ions, both of them being in excited states [32]. Erbium was the first lanthanide ion, where the ETU was observed [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%