2019
DOI: 10.7150/jca.29807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EZH2/Bcl-2 Coexpression Predicts Worse Survival in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas and Demonstrates Poor Efficacy to Rituximab in Localized Lesions

Abstract: Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and Bcl-2 gene rearrangement or protein upregulation played pivotal roles in the carcinogenesis of various malignancies including lymphomas. However, EZH2/Bcl-2 expression pattern and its clinicopathologic/prognostic significance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain unclear. To identify the association among EZH2, Bcl-2, clinicopathologic parametres in DLBCL, 2 DLBCL patient sets (test cohort, n=85; validation cohort n=51) and DLBCL cell lines were studied by tumor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some studies suggested that EZH2 mutations are associated with resistance to R-CHOP regimen [23], in our study, there was no significant correlation between response to R-CHOP therapy or survivals with either EZH2 or BCL2L11 polymorphisms. This is in contrary with findings by Deng et al who found that EZH2/Bcl-2 coexpression correlated to worse objective response rate in DLBCL patients [24]. On the other hand, Cummin et al found that overall outcomes are similar in mutant and wild-type EZH2 mutations when adjusted for COO and IPI [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Although some studies suggested that EZH2 mutations are associated with resistance to R-CHOP regimen [23], in our study, there was no significant correlation between response to R-CHOP therapy or survivals with either EZH2 or BCL2L11 polymorphisms. This is in contrary with findings by Deng et al who found that EZH2/Bcl-2 coexpression correlated to worse objective response rate in DLBCL patients [24]. On the other hand, Cummin et al found that overall outcomes are similar in mutant and wild-type EZH2 mutations when adjusted for COO and IPI [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Moreover, it has recently been described that MELK interacts with the transcription factor FOXM1 (a master regulator for cell proliferation) in a Plk-1-dependent manner and that EZH2-mediated radiation resistance occurs through a MELK-FOXM1-dependent manner in glioblastoma cells 9,44 . FOXM1, Plk-1, and EZH2 are all described as interesting therapeutic targets in both DLBCL and MCL, and high expression of these genes is reported to be associated with poor survival in lymphoma patients [45][46][47][48] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the primary prognostic risk assessment method for DLBCL, especially in high-risk patients, and is used for R-CHOP chemotherapies [ 8 – 10 ]. However, IPI cannot accurately predict the therapeutic effect of R-CHOP in DLBCL patients [ 11 ]. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that the detection of the apoptosis inhibitor, survivin [ 12 ], activation­induced cytidine deaminase (AID) [ 13 ], plasma miRNA [ 14 ], exosome miRNA [ 15 ], and genes polymorphism [ 16 , 17 ], as well as the presence of CD3 and FoxP3 in the immune microenvironment [ 18 ], were all potential indicators of treatment efficacy in DLBCL patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%