1953
DOI: 10.1037/h0059534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
42
3

Year Published

1958
1958
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
42
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the long-to-long group already had 100 trials of training in the initial long learning phase, their timing was further from the US in the second long phase, in contrast to the group that was shifted to the short ISI. This indicates that the short ISI produced better timing relative to the US than did the long ISI, and this result is consistent with conclusions from prior studies that the 200-to 500-ms CS range produces optimal conditioning in humans, as compared to ISIs that fall outside of this range (McAllister, 1953).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the long-to-long group already had 100 trials of training in the initial long learning phase, their timing was further from the US in the second long phase, in contrast to the group that was shifted to the short ISI. This indicates that the short ISI produced better timing relative to the US than did the long ISI, and this result is consistent with conclusions from prior studies that the 200-to 500-ms CS range produces optimal conditioning in humans, as compared to ISIs that fall outside of this range (McAllister, 1953).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous studies examining multiple ISI durations found that the optimal ISI lies approximately between 200 and 500 ms in both nonhuman mammals (Coleman & Gormezano, 1971;Gormezano et al, 1962;Schneiderman, 1966;Schneiderman & Gormezano, 1964;Smith, 1968;Smith, Coleman, & Gormezano, 1969) and humans (McAllister, 1953). Accordingly, in the present study the short ISI (350 ms) was within an optimal range, whereas the long ISI (850 ms) was not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Presumably, acetylcholine released from basal forebrain cells causes sequentially focused attention upon these two associable representations; each representation would be selectively attended for approximately one half second corresponding to the ®ring cycles of cholinergic neurons (for further discussion, see Section 2.1 and Woolf, 1996a). The time frame posited here is consistent with the long-standing observation that 250±500 msec intervals between the CS and US produce optimal conditioning (McAllister, 1943;McAdam et al, 1965). In this time frame, one associable representation would immediately follow the other; in other words, the two representations would be temporally successive.…”
Section: Amygdalar Nuclei Resemble Modulessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…* indicates signifi cant difference (p < 0.05) compared to hypothetical value of 0.5 (i.e., no preference). ulus interval have been as varied as eye-blink conditioning in humans (McAllister, 1953), aversive conditioning in goldfi sh (Bitterman, 1964), key-peck autoshaping in pigeons (Gibbon et al, 1977), context fear conditioning in rats (Bevins and Ayres, 1995), nicotine-conditioned hyperactivity in rats , and ethanol place conditioning in mice (Cunningham et al, 1997). The present research extended this list to include place conditioning with IV administered nicotine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%