Abstract:Lash ptosis was significantly worse in MP than in AP. Lower LF was correlated with more severe LP. Ptosis repair resulted in significant improvement of LP and its symmetry with the contralateral eyelid. Lash ptosis symmetry did not correlate with eyelid height symmetry postoperatively.
“…1 Our group, in fact, performed a prospective, in-person pre- and postoperative assessment of all the eyelid parameters in patients with unilateral myogenic (58 patients) and aponeurotic (20 patients) ptosis. 2–4 Preoperative MRD2 ratio of ptotic/nonptotic was ≥1 in 98.1% of myogenic and 100% of aponeurotic ptosis. Mean MRD2 then significantly decreased (less inferior scleral show) by 0.5 mm in both groups after the levator surgery.…”
FIG. 1. Left congenital myogenic upper eyelid ptosis with associated lower scleral show or more margin reflex distance 2 (A, C) which improved after levator surgery (B, D).
“…1 Our group, in fact, performed a prospective, in-person pre- and postoperative assessment of all the eyelid parameters in patients with unilateral myogenic (58 patients) and aponeurotic (20 patients) ptosis. 2–4 Preoperative MRD2 ratio of ptotic/nonptotic was ≥1 in 98.1% of myogenic and 100% of aponeurotic ptosis. Mean MRD2 then significantly decreased (less inferior scleral show) by 0.5 mm in both groups after the levator surgery.…”
FIG. 1. Left congenital myogenic upper eyelid ptosis with associated lower scleral show or more margin reflex distance 2 (A, C) which improved after levator surgery (B, D).
“…This omission was an oversight of our literature search. Review of these articles cited [1][2][3][4][5][6] in his Letter to the Editor raise several important questions.We would like to summarize the most salient points as they pertain to our data and draw comparisons where possible. One of the major findings in our study was that, in unilateral congenital ptosis, the ptotic side was more likely to have a smaller MRD2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This omission was an oversight of our literature search. Review of these articles cited [1][2][3][4][5][6] in his Letter to the Editor raise several important questions.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.