2018
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1480483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye tracking as a mean to detect feigned cognitive impairment in the Word Memory Test

Abstract: Eye movements showed initial promise for the detection of deception and may be harder to consciously manipulate than conventional accuracy measures. Therefore, we integrated an eye-tracker with the Word Memory Test (WMT) and tested its usefulness for the detection of feigned cognitive impairment. As part of the study, simulators (n = 44) and honest controls (n = 41) performed WMT's immediate-recognition (IR) subtest while their eye movements were recorded. In comparison to the control group, simulators spent l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also had significantly longer RTs than honest controls. These findings are in line with those of recent simulation studies using FCRM-PVTs, including the WMT (Elbaum et al, 2019;Lau et al, 2017;Lupu et al, 2018;Tomer et al, 2018). They also correspond to those of studies in which information processing speed tasks other than FCRM-PVTs were utilized (Reicker, 2008;Willison & Tombaugh, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also had significantly longer RTs than honest controls. These findings are in line with those of recent simulation studies using FCRM-PVTs, including the WMT (Elbaum et al, 2019;Lau et al, 2017;Lupu et al, 2018;Tomer et al, 2018). They also correspond to those of studies in which information processing speed tasks other than FCRM-PVTs were utilized (Reicker, 2008;Willison & Tombaugh, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, endorsing an intentional strategy of decreased attention when presented with the stimuli at the PVT's learning phase may have reduced the simulators' stimulus-memory trace match. This interpretation corresponds to findings of a recent study in which participants' eye movements were monitored while performing the WMT (Tomer et al, 2018). Simulators in this study seemed to avoid the screen areas in which the stimuli (i.e., words) were presented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eye-related measures, such as pupil dilation ( Palinko et al, 2010 ), fixation duration ( Matthews et al, 2015 ), saccade rate, and gaze shifts ( Tomer et al, 2018 ), as well as saccadic range ( May et al, 1990 ), were reported as indices of mental workload. There is limited evidence for ocular measures as stress indicators, and most findings are concerning pupil dilation ( Pedrotti et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies focused on how deceivers exhibit different eye-gaze fixation patterns (Schwedes & Wentura, 2012) and pupil dilation variations (Bradley et al, 2008;Cook et al, 2012;Webb et al, 2010) relative to truth-tellers. Also, Tomer et al (2020) integrated eye tracking technology with the Word Memory Test (WMT; Green, 2003) in order to test its usefulness for detecting feigned cognitive impairment. This was found to measure cognitive processes and showed initial promises for the detection of feigned cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Eye Tracking As Performance Validity Measurementioning
confidence: 99%