2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye-selective fMRI activity in human primary visual cortex: Comparison between 3 ​T and 9.4 ​T, and effects across cortical depth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here it was computed from motion corrected and detrended NORDICmagn data before motion and RETROICOR regressors were filtered out to avoid uneven comparison with previous ultrahigh field (≥7T) submillimeter studies. The average tSNR within ROIs was 39.47 ±5.07 across subjects, which is comparable to, if not higher than what is commonly reported for submillimeter 7T GE-BOLD setups (Aitken et al, 2020; Beckett et al, 2020; Huber, Ivanov, et al, 2018; Rua et al, 2017; Stanley et al, 2020; Zaretskaya et al, 2020). Huber, Ivanov, et al, (2018), Rua et al, (2017) and Aitken et al, (2020), for example, reported tSNR value across subjects of 39, ∼20 and 12.5, respectively, in motor and visual cortex ROIs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Here it was computed from motion corrected and detrended NORDICmagn data before motion and RETROICOR regressors were filtered out to avoid uneven comparison with previous ultrahigh field (≥7T) submillimeter studies. The average tSNR within ROIs was 39.47 ±5.07 across subjects, which is comparable to, if not higher than what is commonly reported for submillimeter 7T GE-BOLD setups (Aitken et al, 2020; Beckett et al, 2020; Huber, Ivanov, et al, 2018; Rua et al, 2017; Stanley et al, 2020; Zaretskaya et al, 2020). Huber, Ivanov, et al, (2018), Rua et al, (2017) and Aitken et al, (2020), for example, reported tSNR value across subjects of 39, ∼20 and 12.5, respectively, in motor and visual cortex ROIs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…High-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) offers the potential to measure depth-dependent hemodynamic responses, which can provide insights into cortical information processing and microcircuits of the human brain (Douglas and Martin, 2004;Lawrence et al, 2019;Stephan et al, 2019). Numerous studies have investigated the function of cortical layers using the blood-oxygenationlevel-dependent (BOLD) contrast (Ogawa et al, 1990) in animals and humans (Aitken et al, 2020;Bollmann and Barth, 2020;Chen et al, 2013;de Hollander et al, 2021;Goense et al, 2012;Goense and Logothetis, 2006;Koopmans et al, 2010;Polimeni et al, 2010;Poplawsky et al, 2015;Ress et al, 2007;Self et al, 2017;Silva and Koretsky, 2002;van Dijk et al, 2020;Vizioli et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2014;Zaretskaya et al, 2020); for a brief history of the field see also Norris and Polimeni (2019). Despite the high sensitivity of this technique, it suffers from limited specificity due to signal leakage in draining veins carrying blood from (activated) lower layers to superficial layers and further to the pial veins (Duvernoy et al, 1981;Kim et al, 1994;Turner, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoothing in neuroimaging is criticized for reducing the experimental effect size and localization of cortical areas, especially in the case of volumetric analysis (Stelzer et al 2014;Coalson et al 2018). In the worst case, it can entirely cancel an effect that exists on a very fine spatial scale, like the ocular dominance column signal (Zaretskaya et al 2020). This is why smoothing in the current study was performed exclusively for the whole-brain analysis.…”
Section: Whole-brain Thickness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%