2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye lens and thyroid gland radiation exposure for patients undergoing brain computed tomography examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other sensitive organs such as skin and red bone marrow showed significantly reduced exposure in the low-dose protocol. For example, the estimated dose exposure to the thyroid gland was 25.35 mGy, which is similar to the reported literature [19,20]. Importantly, the total effective dose during comprehensive scanning (NCCT + CTA + CTP) was 6.128 mSv in the low-dose protocol as compared 11.48 mSv in the standard scanning, a reduction of 46.6%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Other sensitive organs such as skin and red bone marrow showed significantly reduced exposure in the low-dose protocol. For example, the estimated dose exposure to the thyroid gland was 25.35 mGy, which is similar to the reported literature [19,20]. Importantly, the total effective dose during comprehensive scanning (NCCT + CTA + CTP) was 6.128 mSv in the low-dose protocol as compared 11.48 mSv in the standard scanning, a reduction of 46.6%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…10,11 Moreover, studies on the thyroid's ED and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for both sexes (male and female) have received less attention. [12][13][14][15] Only a few studies have evaluated the risk of thyroid cancer from head CT scans in adults of both sexes using the risk model recommended by the Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR). 12,15,16 Maziar et al 17 assessed the mean ED of thyroid radiation in adults who underwent head CT scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Omer et al . ( 20 ) noted that imaging protocols and lack of training can cause variations in the radiation doses of the lenses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%