Proceedings of the 3rd International Universal Communication Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1667780.1667843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye-gaze experiments for conversation monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All 29 studies used video recording to capture eye gaze during conversation, however nine did not specify how many cameras were used (Beattie, 1978 , 1979 ; Rutter et al, 1978 ; Goodwin, 1980 ; Harrigan, 1985 ; Egbert, 1996 ; Lerner, 2003 ; Park, 2015 ; Blythe et al, 2018 ). Seven studies used one camera for each participant (Lamb, 1981 ; Bavelas et al, 2002 ; Eberhard and Nicholson, 2010 ; Cummins, 2012 ; Ho et al, 2015 ; Holler and Kendrick, 2015 ; Ijuin et al, 2018 ), three studies used one camera for the whole group interaction (Kendon, 1967 ; Harrigan and Steffen, 1983 ; Streeck, 2014 ), seven studies video recorded both each participant plus the whole group interaction (Kalma, 1992 ; Novick et al, 1996 ; Brône et al, 2017 ; Kendrick and Holler, 2017 ; Auer, 2018 ; Weiss, 2018 ; Zima et al, 2019 ), two studies only video recorded two out of three participants and eye tracked the third participant (Jokinen et al, 2009 , 2013 ), one study used two cameras to capture interactions in Italian language and only one camera to capture interactions in Tzeltal and Yeli Dnye languages Rossano et al ( 2009 ). Eleven studies used camera-based eye tracking technology ( Table 4 ), which permits investigators to measure participant's visual behavior by detecting and tracking movement of different parts of the eye (see review: Morimoto and Mimica, 2005 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All 29 studies used video recording to capture eye gaze during conversation, however nine did not specify how many cameras were used (Beattie, 1978 , 1979 ; Rutter et al, 1978 ; Goodwin, 1980 ; Harrigan, 1985 ; Egbert, 1996 ; Lerner, 2003 ; Park, 2015 ; Blythe et al, 2018 ). Seven studies used one camera for each participant (Lamb, 1981 ; Bavelas et al, 2002 ; Eberhard and Nicholson, 2010 ; Cummins, 2012 ; Ho et al, 2015 ; Holler and Kendrick, 2015 ; Ijuin et al, 2018 ), three studies used one camera for the whole group interaction (Kendon, 1967 ; Harrigan and Steffen, 1983 ; Streeck, 2014 ), seven studies video recorded both each participant plus the whole group interaction (Kalma, 1992 ; Novick et al, 1996 ; Brône et al, 2017 ; Kendrick and Holler, 2017 ; Auer, 2018 ; Weiss, 2018 ; Zima et al, 2019 ), two studies only video recorded two out of three participants and eye tracked the third participant (Jokinen et al, 2009 , 2013 ), one study used two cameras to capture interactions in Italian language and only one camera to capture interactions in Tzeltal and Yeli Dnye languages Rossano et al ( 2009 ). Eleven studies used camera-based eye tracking technology ( Table 4 ), which permits investigators to measure participant's visual behavior by detecting and tracking movement of different parts of the eye (see review: Morimoto and Mimica, 2005 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies used camera-based eye tracking technology ( Table 4 ), which permits investigators to measure participant's visual behavior by detecting and tracking movement of different parts of the eye (see review: Morimoto and Mimica, 2005 ). Of these, two studies used a single table eye tracker to track one out of three participants (Jokinen et al, 2009 , 2013 ) and one study tracked the eyes of two out of three participants in the conversation due to technical issues (Auer, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of different multimodal signals in communication becomes understandable, as it is necessary to use all available means to manage interaction. For instance, Jokinen et al [2009] noticed that head turning is relevant for turn management in multiparty conversations. Although gaze is an important initial signal of who could be next speaker, head movement can function as a more visible signal of the speaker's focus of attention, and thus willingness to take the turn or to give the turn.…”
Section: Interaction In Multiparty Conversationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study [Jokinen et al 2009] showed that if the speaker wants to give the turn, she looks at the listeners, while the listeners tend to look at the current speaker, but turn their gaze away if they do not want to take the turn. If the listener wants to take the turn, the listener also looks at the speaker, and turn taking is agreed by the mutual gaze.…”
Section: Turn Taking Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other attempts to employ gaze as an indicator of conversation characteristics include turn-alignment and conversation monitoring studies of Jokinen et al [6,9,8] and a recent study of Hradis et al [4] on voice activity detection during multiparty conversation.…”
Section: Level Of Engagement and Gaze In Conversationmentioning
confidence: 99%