2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye Gaze and Mouse Cursor Relationship in a Debugging Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further works showed that eye-mouse coordination [13] and gaze position [18] could be predicted to some extent by mouse movements, also in the context of non-linear layout SERPs [25]. Outside the search domain, [5] showed in a debugging task that mouse cursor behaviour was a significant indication of the level of difficulty and performance, and the observed cursor patterns were found comparable with the gaze patterns. These works demonstrate that gaze can be approximated with relative accuracy by mouse movements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further works showed that eye-mouse coordination [13] and gaze position [18] could be predicted to some extent by mouse movements, also in the context of non-linear layout SERPs [25]. Outside the search domain, [5] showed in a debugging task that mouse cursor behaviour was a significant indication of the level of difficulty and performance, and the observed cursor patterns were found comparable with the gaze patterns. These works demonstrate that gaze can be approximated with relative accuracy by mouse movements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in Figure 5 that majority of the source code used during the experiment were written in Java programming language. While 24 papers (38 %) used Java alone as a main stimulus, 3 other papers used Java alongside other stimuli such as [CL13] which used Java with C# and [BSB11] and [BBB+15] which used Java with natural language text (NLT). The experiment done by [BBB+15] to compare Jave and NLT reading was later replicated in [PIS17], but replacing Java with C++.…”
Section: [Rq3:] What Programming Materials Were Used As Stimulus In Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tüm bunlar düşünüldüğünde kod senaryolarının içerilerinde barındırdıkları hataların özellikleri ve sayıları farklılaştıkça hata ayıklama performansları üzerinde etkileşim etkisi yaratması muhtemeldir. Yapılan bu çalışmaların katılımcıları genellikle üniversite öğrencileri olup, öğretmenler, öğretim üyeleri, mezun öğrenciler ve bilişim teknolojileri çalışanları da katılım göstermişlerdir (Bednarik, 2012;Chen & Lim, 2013;Grigoreanu ve diğerleri, 2009;Romero ve diğerleri, 2007;Yen ve diğerleri, 2012). Ayrıca araştırmalarda hata ayıklama performanslarını değerlendirmek adına sunulan kod senaryolarında Java dili kullanıldığından dolayı (Bednarik, 2012;Fitzgerald ve diğerleri, 2008;Romero ve diğerleri, 2007) Türkiye'deki mesleki ve teknik liseleri Bilişim Teknolojileri öğrencileri için uygun olmadığı düşünülebilir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified