1994
DOI: 10.1038/371097a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exxon Valdez and bioremediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any positive effects of the products, above that of nutrient addition, were attributed to a cometabolite or some other unknown factor present fortuitously within the product. The concept of developing a genetically engineered 'super-bug' to degrade crude oil singlehandedly is seriously flawed [22]. The metabolic potential required to deal with the diverse array of chemicals within a crude oil is considerable.…”
Section: Bioaugmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any positive effects of the products, above that of nutrient addition, were attributed to a cometabolite or some other unknown factor present fortuitously within the product. The concept of developing a genetically engineered 'super-bug' to degrade crude oil singlehandedly is seriously flawed [22]. The metabolic potential required to deal with the diverse array of chemicals within a crude oil is considerable.…”
Section: Bioaugmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the concept of developing a genetically engineered strain with the broad metabolic potential required to deal with the diverse array of hydrocarbon components of crude oil has serious shortcomings because of the range of new genes which would need to be incorporated. Moreover, the burden of maintaining all of these genes is likely to make the engineered strains noncompetitive in the natural environment (377).…”
Section: Treatment Of Contaminated Soils and Sludgesmentioning
confidence: 99%