Abstract:Sixteen years after scleral buckle surgery with a hydrogel episcleral exoplant, a 43-year-old woman presented with progressive binocular diplopia, ptosis, and an expanding mass in her upper eyelid. She underwent surgical removal of the hydrogel exoplant through an anterior approach. The exoplant proved to be friable, fragmented, and encapsulated in a fibrous tissue; the exoplant was removed in its entirety. Postoperatively, the eyelid mass resolved, while her diplopia and ptosis improved slightly.
“…Whilst it is important to remove all of the foreign material at the time of surgery, it does not appear to matter if some capsular elements are left behind. 8,9 The cause of the bony defect in this patient remains uncertain but is likely secondary to a prior spontaneous bony dehiscence of the sinus floor predisposing to rupture of the overlying sinus mucosa during irrigation. Such defects can usually be detected by a careful review of the CT scans preoperatively.…”
During minitrephination and irrigation of the frontal sinus, mucus extravasated into the orbit through a defect in the sinus floor. The mucus incited a foreign body reaction and became encapsulated within the orbit necessitating excision via an anterior orbitotomy.
“…Whilst it is important to remove all of the foreign material at the time of surgery, it does not appear to matter if some capsular elements are left behind. 8,9 The cause of the bony defect in this patient remains uncertain but is likely secondary to a prior spontaneous bony dehiscence of the sinus floor predisposing to rupture of the overlying sinus mucosa during irrigation. Such defects can usually be detected by a careful review of the CT scans preoperatively.…”
During minitrephination and irrigation of the frontal sinus, mucus extravasated into the orbit through a defect in the sinus floor. The mucus incited a foreign body reaction and became encapsulated within the orbit necessitating excision via an anterior orbitotomy.
“…[17][18][19][20] Extruded portions of the device may present as eyelid masses. 18,19 Although the extrusion is clinically evident, there is likely concomitant intrusion or erosion into the globe ( Figure 4). Therefore, comprehensive assessment via radiographic imaging is recommended to identify more serious complications.…”
The constellation of imaging features helps distinguish expanded hydrogel buckles from other orbital diseases. Imaging also serves to precisely localize hydrogel scleral buckle components requiring removal.
“…A large study of 386 patients with hydrogel scleral buckles found that 1.3% of cases required explantation. 2 Other severe complications include implant expansion and fragmentation, 3–5 orbital pseudo-cellulitis, 6 orbital pseudotumor, 6–9 diplopia, 3,4,7,8 ptosis, 3 anterior erosion through the orbital septum and orbicularis oculi muscle, 10 spontaneous expulsion from the eye, 11 and infection of the scleral buckle. 12 …”
Purpose
To describe intraocular invasion of MIRAgel scleral buckles requiring evisceration.
Methods
This is an IRB-approved retrospective consecutive case series of eyes requiring evisceration secondary to intraocular intrusion of MIRAgel implants performed at the Cole Eye Institute from 2000 to 2014. Charts were reviewed for age at surgery, gender, laterality, time between MIRAgel placement to evisceration, preoperative examination and imaging results, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and duration of follow-up.
Results
Five eyes of five patients underwent evisceration due to a blind, painful eye secondary to MIRAgel expansion. The mean time between MIRAgel placement and evisceration was 21 years (range: 17 to 30 years). Preoperative ultrasound identified intraocular MIRAgel in 3/5 cases; however, intraocular MIRAgel was identified during surgery in all 5 cases. A transocular-approach orbitotomy was performed at the time of evisceration in an effort to remove the MIRAgel. Post-operative complications included ptosis and inability to retain an ocular prosthesis. No cases of orbital implant extrusion occurred.
Conclusion
Scleral invasion and intraocular penetration of MIRAgel may occur decades after placement. This may result in a blind, painful eye requiring evisceration and orbitotomy to remove residual material. Suspicion of intraocular penetration of implant should be high in blind, painful eyes. Surgical removal can be difficult due to MIRAgel fragmentation. Conjunctival insufficiency may result in the need for further surgery after evisceration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.