2019
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extruded meat alternatives made from Maillard‐reacted beef bone hydrolysate and plant proteins. Part II – application in sausages

Abstract: This study investigated the physicochemical properties of sausages made from meat alternatives made from Maillard‐reacted beef bone hydrolysate and plant proteins (soy protein and wheat gluten) at different moisture contents (MC; S49%MC, S52%MC, S56%MC and S60%MC). S49%MC had the highest hardness and chewiness, observed with chunks of long fibres under SEM. The hardness and chewiness of sausages decreased as MC increased. S60%MC exhibited soft and mushy texture, and no fibre structure was observed. Sausages ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these elements are present in the studied samples and within acceptable limits. When comparing this research finding with the previous study done by (Chiang et al., 2020a), there is a slight difference in the amount of amino acid content. The rationale may be in different species of beef, animal age, the effect of feeding high or low amino acid compound, processing (Chiang et al., 2020b), slaughter weight, and gender (Fang et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…All these elements are present in the studied samples and within acceptable limits. When comparing this research finding with the previous study done by (Chiang et al., 2020a), there is a slight difference in the amount of amino acid content. The rationale may be in different species of beef, animal age, the effect of feeding high or low amino acid compound, processing (Chiang et al., 2020b), slaughter weight, and gender (Fang et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The samples exhibited anisotropic, layered, or striated microstructures, except for CF‐A2, FF‐A1, CN‐A2, and P‐A2. The structures were disrupted and altered due to the grinding of the texturised or non‐texturised plant proteins during the preparation (Chiang et al ., 2020b). CF‐A2 and FF‐A1 were made up of mycoprotein with filamentous and branched nature of hyphae (Finnigan, 2011), comparable to the morphology of animal muscle cells but at smaller fibre sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%