not contextualizing health insurance in other forms of social protection, Huang misses an opportunity to broaden her argument's impact on other bodies of literature such as the productionist welfare state. But this minor criticism does not undermine the fundamental contribution a focused analysis of the health insurance system provides.Social Protection under Authoritarianism is an empirically rich deep dive into China's social health insurance program, its complexities, determinants, and outcomes for inequality. It is a welcome addition to the study of authoritarian redistribution and the growing literature on authoritarian welfare systems. Andreas Wiedemann's Indebted Societies has received praises and awards since it was first published in 2021. This review won't challenge this well-deserved reception of the book. Wiedemann's book is indeed an amazing contribution to two essential areas of study in Comparative Political Economy (CPE): welfare states and credit markets. Wiedemann convincingly argues that these two areas -which are often analyzed separately, are actually deeply intertwined. The book examines whether people go into debt (or not), which people go into debt and for what reasons they do so across and within political economies. The answers to these questions largely depend on the extent to which social policies cover the income fluctuations to which people are increasingly exposed over their life course. However, this is only one part of the story. They also depend on the very possibility of individuals to borrow. Characteristics of the welfare state thus act in conjunction with characteristics of the national credit regime to shape if and how people go into debt.When the welfare state is weak, and access to credit is easy, like in the US, private indebtedness largely substitutes itself to social policies. This means that (especially low and middle income) people borrow to make ends meet in case they get laid off or when they get sick. When the welfare state remains relatively strong, and access to credit is also easy, like in Denmark, private indebtedness mostly complements social investments. This means that (especially high income) people borrow to invest in social opportunities (e.g., taking time off work for training purposes). Whatever the characteristics of the welfare state, when access to credit is difficult, people simply can't borrow. Even when some segments of the population would have incentives to borrow to mitigate the effects of the welfare state's retrenchment, like in Germany, they have no capacity to do so and levels of private indebtedness remain low.