2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrinsic calibration of a conoscopic holography system integrated in a CMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has a modular setup with interchangeable objective lenses enabling various standoffs and working ranges for the same sensor. When integrated in measurement devices, conoscopic technology offers major benefits, such as collinear measurement, low electronic noise dependency, and multiple standoffs, compared with the old-style triangulation method [39]. Table 1 gives the main characteristics of the CH sensor for 50 mm lenses.…”
Section: System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a modular setup with interchangeable objective lenses enabling various standoffs and working ranges for the same sensor. When integrated in measurement devices, conoscopic technology offers major benefits, such as collinear measurement, low electronic noise dependency, and multiple standoffs, compared with the old-style triangulation method [39]. Table 1 gives the main characteristics of the CH sensor for 50 mm lenses.…”
Section: System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As each point is digitized, the position of the MC axes is registered together with the distance-to-point (𝛾) measured by the CH sensor, and the point coordinates must be expressed in terms that can be recognized by the MC reference system to enable the information to be used for metrological purposes. This is done by means of an extrinsic calibration procedure, inspired by the technique described in [14],…”
Section: Attachment Of the Ch Sensor To The MC And Extrinsic Calibrat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are two types of methods for calibration of the global coordinate system. One adopts a unified calibration object according to the different types of sensors and realizes the global calibration by measuring the calibration object with each sensor [8][9][10]. The other adopts the numerical calculation of the rigid-body transformation matrix by extracting three-dimensional data characteristics of the same object measured by each sensor to achieve global calibration [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a multisensor system that comprises a contact probe and an optical scanning probe, geometric invariant of characteristics of the unified target is usually adopted to achieve global calibration. Targets in these methods include a standard sphere [10,13], standard sphere gauge [14,15], polyhedron [9,16], and other special standard objects [17]. The multisensor calibration methods were analyzed and compared using polyhedral and spherical artefacts by Fernández et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%