2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1508.06253
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremes of the two-dimensional Gaussian free field with scale-dependent variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 70) is positive and log-convex (in the interval containing t = 0 where it has no poles) if Z t is; had we chosen the naïve continuation of ( 58), this would no longer be the case since we would have instead " exp(tF ) = Γ(1−tβ −1 ) Γ(1−t) Z −t e tc ′′ . Now, it is easy to see that the prediction for the fluctuating part of the free energy F encoded in (70), which was obtained solely from arguments based on 1RSB and analytical continuations, is equivalent to the freezing scenario (25): Indeed, the RHS of (25) (for β > 1) and ( 70) coincide. By (52), the LHS side of ( 70) equals e tβ −1 ln Z0 R −∂ y G β (y)e ty dy, which is just (25), provided we make the identification of F (M, β > 1, f ij ) in ( 26) with the unknown and formally divergent constant in (69):…”
Section: Freezing Scenariomentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…( 70) is positive and log-convex (in the interval containing t = 0 where it has no poles) if Z t is; had we chosen the naïve continuation of ( 58), this would no longer be the case since we would have instead " exp(tF ) = Γ(1−tβ −1 ) Γ(1−t) Z −t e tc ′′ . Now, it is easy to see that the prediction for the fluctuating part of the free energy F encoded in (70), which was obtained solely from arguments based on 1RSB and analytical continuations, is equivalent to the freezing scenario (25): Indeed, the RHS of (25) (for β > 1) and ( 70) coincide. By (52), the LHS side of ( 70) equals e tβ −1 ln Z0 R −∂ y G β (y)e ty dy, which is just (25), provided we make the identification of F (M, β > 1, f ij ) in ( 26) with the unknown and formally divergent constant in (69):…”
Section: Freezing Scenariomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…),(26) is the non-fluctuating part of the minimum, and contributes a deterministic shift to ln Z[ρ]. Up to translation, − ln Z[ρ] has the same distribution as the critical temperature free energy, as one can see from the above equation and(70). Note that up to now in the present paper the over-line in Z t (11) was a formal symbol and did not correspond to any genuine average, so (E20) gives it a probability interpretation, in terms of the random measure ρ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However the property of duality invariance is not restricted to the replica limit n = 0. In [12] by considering the generating functions for the moments of the partition function, one notices that duality invariance can be extended to finite n by further requiring n β = nβ (see (25) there where s should be identified as −nβ).…”
Section: Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the problem of characterizing the distribution of the global maximum M N = max x∈D N V N,x of LCG fields and processes (or their continuum analogues) recently attracted a lot of interest, in physics, see [6,11,12,13,14,15] and mathematics, see [16,17,18,2,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The distribution is proved to be given by the Gumbel distribution with random shift [20] and has a universal tail predicted by renormalization group arguments in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%