Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives This study sought to determine if obese patients had worse post-LVAD implantation outcomes and if the implantation of an LVAD allowed for weight loss. Background Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease including heart failure. Obese heart failure patients have better outcomes than those with normal weight; however obese patients have worse outcomes following heart transplantation. Methods Patients were identified in the UNOS database that underwent LVAD implantation as bridge to transplantation from May 2004 and April 2014, with follow-up through June 2014. Patients were grouped according to BMI based on the WHO classification Results Among 3,856 patients the risk of death or delisting was not significantly different between BMI groups (p=0.347). There was no increased risk of death (p=0.234) or delisting (p=0.918). The risk of complication requiring UNOS status upgrade was increased for those with Class II obesity or greater (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93, p=0.004), driven by increased infection and thromboembolism. Obese patients had worse post-transplant outcomes. Weight loss substantial enough to decrease BMI group was achieved by a small proportion of patients listed with Class I obesity or greater (9.6–15.5%). Conclusions Patients with obesity had similar freedom from death or delisting while on LVAD support. However, Class II obese or greater patients had an increased risk of complications requiring UNOS status upgrade compared with those with normal BMI during LVAD support and decreased post-transplant survival. Weight loss on device therapy was possible, but uncommon. Careful consideration is needed when a bridge to weight loss strategy is proposed.
Objectives This study sought to determine if obese patients had worse post-LVAD implantation outcomes and if the implantation of an LVAD allowed for weight loss. Background Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease including heart failure. Obese heart failure patients have better outcomes than those with normal weight; however obese patients have worse outcomes following heart transplantation. Methods Patients were identified in the UNOS database that underwent LVAD implantation as bridge to transplantation from May 2004 and April 2014, with follow-up through June 2014. Patients were grouped according to BMI based on the WHO classification Results Among 3,856 patients the risk of death or delisting was not significantly different between BMI groups (p=0.347). There was no increased risk of death (p=0.234) or delisting (p=0.918). The risk of complication requiring UNOS status upgrade was increased for those with Class II obesity or greater (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93, p=0.004), driven by increased infection and thromboembolism. Obese patients had worse post-transplant outcomes. Weight loss substantial enough to decrease BMI group was achieved by a small proportion of patients listed with Class I obesity or greater (9.6–15.5%). Conclusions Patients with obesity had similar freedom from death or delisting while on LVAD support. However, Class II obese or greater patients had an increased risk of complications requiring UNOS status upgrade compared with those with normal BMI during LVAD support and decreased post-transplant survival. Weight loss on device therapy was possible, but uncommon. Careful consideration is needed when a bridge to weight loss strategy is proposed.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are becoming a more frequent life-support intervention. Gaining an understanding of risk factors for infection and management strategies is important for treating these patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies describing infections in continuous-flow LVADs. We evaluated incidence, risk factors, associated microorganisms, and outcomes by type of device and patient characteristics. Our search identified 90 distinct studies that reported LVAD infections and outcomes. Younger age and higher body mass index were associated with higher rates of LVAD infections. Driveline infections were the most common infection reported and the easiest to treat with fewest long-term consequences. Bloodstream infections were not reported as often, but they were associated with stroke and mortality. Treatment strategies varied and did not show a consistent best approach. LVAD infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in LVAD patients. Most research comes from secondary analyses of other LVAD studies. The lack of infection-oriented research leaves several areas understudied. In particular, bloodstream infections in this population merit further research. Providers need more research studies to make evidence-based decisions about the prevention and treatment of LVAD infections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.