2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10687-016-0243-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremes of independent stochastic processes: a point process approach

Abstract: For each n ≥ 1, let {X in , i1} be independent copies of a nonnegative continuous stochastic process X n = (X n (t)) t∈T indexed by a compact metric space T . We are interested in the process of partial maximãwhere the brackets [ · ] denote the integer part. Under a regular variation condition on the sequence of processes X n , we prove that the partial maxima processM n weakly converges to a superextremal processM as n → ∞. We use a point process approach based on the convergence of empirical measures. Proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Max-stable processes with Fréchet marginals. In various applications max-stable processes ζ Z (t), t ∈ T with Fréchet marginals are considered, see e.g., [58][59][60][61][62][63]. Specifically, we define…”
Section: Dieker-mikosch Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Max-stable processes with Fréchet marginals. In various applications max-stable processes ζ Z (t), t ∈ T with Fréchet marginals are considered, see e.g., [58][59][60][61][62][63]. Specifically, we define…”
Section: Dieker-mikosch Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, note that T −1 δ (D k ) ⊂ N k and that T −1 δ (B) is bounded away from N k for all B ∈ B(D) bounded away from D k . Besides, T δ is continuous at every point π such that π([0, T ]×{δ}) = 0, which can be proved with similar arguments as in the proof of Lemma 3.2 in Eyi-Minko and Dombry (2016). It is easily seen that µ * k+1 has no mass on {π([0, T ] × {δ}) = 0} so that the discontinuity set of T δ has vanishing µ * k+1 -measure.…”
Section: The Eventmentioning
confidence: 65%