2015
DOI: 10.3836/tjm/1452806051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremely Strong Boundary Points and Real-linear Isometries

Abstract: Let X, Y be locally compact Hausdorff spaces, A be a complex subspace of C 0 (X) and T : A → C 0 (Y ) be a real-linear isometry, whose range is not assumed to be a complex subspace of C 0 (Y ). In this paper, using the set Θ(A) and τ (A) consisting of all extremely strong boundary points and strong boundary points of A, respectively we introduce appropriate subsets Y 0 and Y 1 of Y and give a description of T on these sets. More precisely, we show that there exist continuous functions Φ :for all f ∈ A and y ∈ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that Ch(A) is a boundary for A, that is, for each f ∈ A, there exists a point x ∈ Ch(A) such that |f (x)| = f X , see [16,Page 184]. In general, δ(A) ⊆ Ch(A) (see [8,Lemma 3.1]) and if A is a function algebra, then δ(A) = Ch(A) (see [10,Theorem 4.7.22] for compact case and [15, Theorem 2.1] for general case).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that Ch(A) is a boundary for A, that is, for each f ∈ A, there exists a point x ∈ Ch(A) such that |f (x)| = f X , see [16,Page 184]. In general, δ(A) ⊆ Ch(A) (see [8,Lemma 3.1]) and if A is a function algebra, then δ(A) = Ch(A) (see [10,Theorem 4.7.22] for compact case and [15, Theorem 2.1] for general case).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this work is to give a complete characterization of surjective isometries T : A → B between completely regular subspaces. It is worth noting that a similar problem was recently investigated by Jamshidi and Sady [5]; however, our approach is significantly different. Instead of using the mapping T to induce a mapping T * : B * → A * between the dual spaces and then investigating the extreme points of the unit ball thereof, we adapt Eilenberg's [3,Theorem 7.2] proof of the Banach-Stone theorem, whose arguments hinge on the fact that the maximal convex subsets of the unit sphere of C(X) are essentially in a one-to-one correspondence with X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The study of isometries between subspaces of continuous functions originally dates back to the classical Banach-Stone theorem. The theorem has various generalizations (in scalar valued case) based on different techniques, see for example [6,9,12,13,16,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%