2010
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremely low‐frequency electromagnetic fields affect the immune response of monocyte‐derived macrophages to pathogens

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) on the physiological response of phagocytes to an infectious agent. THP-1 cells (human monocytic leukemia cell line) were cultured and 50 Hz, 1 mT EMF was applied for 4-6 h to cells induced with Staphylococcus aureus or interferon gamma/lipopolysaccharide (IFγ/LPS). Alterations in nitric oxide (NO), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) levels, heat shock protein 70 levels (hsp70), cGMP levels, caspase-9 activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, the experimental setup and exposure conditions differed strongly from our study, but all studies used a 50 Hz signal. Interestingly, other immune cell-related responses were found to be modulated by 50 Hz LF EMF, including reactive oxygen species production in macrophages [Akan et al, 2010;Frahm et al, 2010]. The differences in the findings between these studies and our study can partially be explained by our use of 5 mT signals, compared to the milliTesla (mT) ranges most studies employ.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these studies, the experimental setup and exposure conditions differed strongly from our study, but all studies used a 50 Hz signal. Interestingly, other immune cell-related responses were found to be modulated by 50 Hz LF EMF, including reactive oxygen species production in macrophages [Akan et al, 2010;Frahm et al, 2010]. The differences in the findings between these studies and our study can partially be explained by our use of 5 mT signals, compared to the milliTesla (mT) ranges most studies employ.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Their potential harmful effects on biological systems, such as leukemia, breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease, are under constant debate [Ahlbom et al, 2008]. In contrast, beneficial effects of LF EMF have been reported, including decreased severity of intestinal lesions in coccidian-infected chickens , accelerated wound healing [Callaghan et al, 2008;Goudarzi et al, 2010] and accelerated bone healing in rats and humans [Grana et al, 2008;Griffin et al, 2008], and augmented response of macrophages to bacterial challenges in humans [Akan et al, 2010]. To date, no mechanism of action has been elucidated, although several possible mechanisms have been suggested, including changes in signal transduction pathways and modulation of oxygen radicals [Liburdy et al, 1993;Blank and Soo 2001;Rollwitz et al, 2004;Frahm et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cells were induced with S. aureus or IFγ/LPS, field application produced higher levels of hsp70, and suppressed the caspase-9 activation. These data showed that ELF-EMF affect the response of immune system, which suggests that it can be considered for beneficial uses (37). Another hypothesis of effects related with ELF-EMF is that it changes the free radical levels in the organism.…”
Section: Evidence For Cellular Effects Of Electromagnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In this case, linearly increasing distribution reduces the reflected power much more than the other distribution functions up to 33 GHz. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] GHz range, sinusoidal and linearly decreasing functions are more useful in terms of small reflection. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%