2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2018.8644126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremely Large Aperture Massive MIMO: Low Complexity Receiver Architectures

Abstract: This paper focuses on new communication paradigms arising in massive multiple-input-multiple-output systems where the antenna array at the base station is of extremely large dimension (xMaMIMO). Due to the extreme dimension of the array, xMaMIMO is characterized by spatial non-stationary field properties along the array; this calls for a multi-antenna transceiver design that is adapted to the array dimension but also its non-stationary properties. We address implementation aspects of xMaMIMO, with computationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for extremely large MIMO system [39]- [41], the wideband effect or beam squint must be considered, which was unfortunately still ignored in their discussion. 4…”
Section: E Summary Of Wideband-narrowband Channel Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for extremely large MIMO system [39]- [41], the wideband effect or beam squint must be considered, which was unfortunately still ignored in their discussion. 4…”
Section: E Summary Of Wideband-narrowband Channel Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) clearly shows the interplay between the wireless transmission part and the computational part via the transmission and computational latency. Furthermore, a coupling between the transmission and fronthaul latency through the number of quantization bits can also be observed from (16). For example, an increase in the quantization bits decreases the quantization error which reduces the transmission latency, while on the other hand, it increases the required number of bits transmitted to the BBU, thereby increasing the fronthaul latency.…”
Section: Computation Offloading and Latency Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, we illustrate the obtained communication (transmit power p k , ∀k, first sub-figure) and computational (normalized number of CPU cycles f k F T , ∀k, second sub-figure) resources assigned to each IoTD with respect to the corresponding effective channel gains at the BBU, i.e., h e k = 1 T K (V D H I) , ∀k (third sub- figure), the number of computation bits (b k , ∀k, fourth sub-figure) and the latency thresholds (T th k , ∀k, fifth sub- figure). In the fifth sub-figure, we also plot the overall latency ξ k , ∀k computed using (16).…”
Section: A Performance Per Iotds' Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term 'nonstationary' means that the different parts of the array may observe the same channel paths with varying power or distinct channel paths [11], [12]. Specifically, the received energy from each user to different portions of the array varies, and large received energy from a specific user can be observed on a small part of the array only, which introduces an inherent sparsity in the channel matrix [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%