2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-013-5945-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremely cold and persistent stratospheric Arctic vortex in the winter of 2010–2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The star in Figure indicates the observed mean NAM index for the period 17 March to 15 April 2011 estimated from the ERA‐Interim data. Consistent with Hu and Xia [], we find a strongly positive NAM index value of 2.02 σ in the reanalysis in spring 2011. Our simulations suggest that NAM index value exceeding 2 σ is a rare event with index value of such magnitude appearing only twice in R‐SST, 3 times in R‐O3, 4 times in R‐ALL, and never in CONTR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The star in Figure indicates the observed mean NAM index for the period 17 March to 15 April 2011 estimated from the ERA‐Interim data. Consistent with Hu and Xia [], we find a strongly positive NAM index value of 2.02 σ in the reanalysis in spring 2011. Our simulations suggest that NAM index value exceeding 2 σ is a rare event with index value of such magnitude appearing only twice in R‐SST, 3 times in R‐O3, 4 times in R‐ALL, and never in CONTR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time in the observational record, ozone destruction over the Arctic was comparable to that in the Antarctic ozone hole [ Manney et al ., ]. In addition, large positive values of tropospheric NAM index, about 2 standard deviations above the climatology, were observed in late March and April 2011 following the period of a strong stratospheric polar night jet [ Hu and Xia , ]. The April mean tropospheric NAM index values were unprecedented in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis since 1950 (http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/ao.shtml).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Arctic polar vortex showed low temperatures and highspeed zonal winds, and it was associated with a weak stratospheric wave activity and a strong positive phase of the Arctic Oscillation. All these effects caused an enhanced ozone chemical loss greater than 80%(Arnone et al 2012;Krzyscin 2012;Hu and Xia 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be expected, the Arosa/ Davos TCO is about 10% higher and much more variable than the near-global mean showing strong spikes in 1993 (after Mt. Pinatubo eruption due to a hemispheric asymmetry of the ozone signal (Aquila et al, 2013)) and 2011 (when the northern polar vortex was rather strong and persistent during the cold season (Hu and Xia, 2013)). The correlation coefficient between the near-global (northern hemisphere) means and Arosa/Davos TCO is 0.74 (0.87).…”
Section: Using Arosa/davos Total Column Ozone Data For the Reconstruction Of The Global Or Hemispheric Mean Total Column Ozone Behavior Fmentioning
confidence: 56%