The Solar Dynamics Observatory 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3673-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) Multiple EUV Grating Spectrographs (MEGS): Radiometric Calibrations and Results

Abstract: The NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), scheduled for launch in early 2010, incorporates a suite of instruments including the Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE). EVE has multiple instruments including the Multiple Extreme ultraviolet Grating Spectrographs (MEGS) A, B, and P instruments, the Solar Aspect Monitor (SAM), and the Extreme ultraviolet SpectroPhotometer (ESP). The radiometric calibration of EVE, necessary to convert the instrument counts to physical units, was performed at the Nation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the 2010 launch of the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), Version 3 of the LASP composite was created which filled gaps in the SORCE SOLSTICE Lyman α observations with Lyman α measurements from the Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) (Woods et al, ) Multiple Extreme ultraviolet Grating Spectrographs P (Hock et al, ) instrument. In the Version 3 composite, TIMED SEE, SORCE SOLSTICE, and SDO EVE data are all scaled to UARS SOLSTICE and are not smoothed.…”
Section: Previous Lasp Lyman α Composites (Versions 1–3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the 2010 launch of the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), Version 3 of the LASP composite was created which filled gaps in the SORCE SOLSTICE Lyman α observations with Lyman α measurements from the Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) (Woods et al, ) Multiple Extreme ultraviolet Grating Spectrographs P (Hock et al, ) instrument. In the Version 3 composite, TIMED SEE, SORCE SOLSTICE, and SDO EVE data are all scaled to UARS SOLSTICE and are not smoothed.…”
Section: Previous Lasp Lyman α Composites (Versions 1–3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FISM‐M advances daily and flare empirical irradiance variability modeling by relating measurements of EUV irradiance variations in broad spectral bands to spectral irradiance measurements in the 6–106 nm range made by the EUV Variability Experiment (EVE) [ Woods et al , ], which is on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) satellite launched on 11 February 2010 and has improved spectral and temporal resolution as well as an improved responsivity calibration accuracy compared to its predecessor, Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) Solar EUV Experiment (SEE) [ Woods et al , ; Hock et al , ]. The 6–106 nm range is measured by EVE with the Multiple EUV Grating Spectrographs (MEGS) at 0.1 nm resolution and 10s time cadence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDO EVE's improved observation cadence is suitable for measuring flare irradiance, which can vary by tens to hundreds of percent over a period of minutes and last tens of minutes to hours (depending on wavelength and flare magnitude). With regard to improved uncertainty, the MEGS responsivity is known to within 1–3% (1 σ ) uncertainty below 80 nm from preflight calibrations [ Hock et al , ], in comparison with the 3–7% (1 σ ) preflight responsivity uncertainty of SEE EGS [ Woods et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the corona in such a holistic sense provides perspectives lost in narrowly focused active region studies. EVE spectra are particularly well suited to this task because extra effort has been made to provide in-flight calibration thanks to sounding rocket under-flights with an identical instrument (Hock et al 2010). Additionally, the ability to identify individual emission lines in EVE spectra allows for the selection of diagnostics representing a wide range of coronal conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%